bees VS npm

Btrfs defrag 'will break up the reflinks of COW data' and 'may cause considerable increase of space usage depending on the broken up reflinks'. To try to fix this, I would run bees to try and deduplicate the now duplicate reflinks. It may be worth doing this from e.g. a livedisk though as out of space errors can cause things to break (so don't upgrade packages till you fix this).

Figuring out which paths are needed outside gcroots'ed closures is pretty complicated. If you're using flakes, the main issue is duplicates, so store optimization and bees may help. With channels, once you update a channel you might as well gc everything else.

bees

I felt more confident with the code/developer/docs. The author knows his stuff regarding btrfs. Like, look at this, it's amazing: https://github.com/Zygo/bees/blob/master/docs/btrfs-kernel.md

I have some time again and wondering if anyone's got Bees, https://github.com/Zygo/bees, running on their Synology.

Even if NixOS doesn't support sending deduplicating syscalls to the kernel, you could use the Btrfs deduping daemon called bees to slowly save space over time. There might be an equivalent for ZFS, too.

This isn't much different than ext4. 0 length files can happen after a crash. You can avoid this by mounting with flushoncommit for the future. See here for details.

Maybe BEES can help you to dedup any blocks, not file.

The fact that JSON doesn't support comments is so annoying, and I always thought that Douglas Crockford's rationale for this basically made no sense ("They can be misused!" - like, so what, nearly anything can be misused. So without support for comments e.g. in package.json files I have to do even worse hacky workaround bullshit like "__some_field_comment": "this is my comment"). There is of course jsonc and JSON5 but the fact that it's not supported everywhere means 10 years later we still can't write comments in package.json (there is https://github.com/npm/npm/issues/4482 and about a million related issues).

Things like the sparkline charts on npmjs (e.g. https://www.npmjs.com/package/npm ) are interactive SVGs. I think they're pretty common for data visualizations of all kinds

I actually did a POC 7 years ago about this - https://github.com/tanepiper/steal-ur-stuff

It was reported to npm at the time, but they chose to ignore it - https://github.com/npm/npm/issues/17724

Every time this pops up, I'm reminded of the day that the NPM registry started returning 418 responses.

I remember being at a training course that day and my manager asking me what we could do to fix it because our CI was failing to pull dependencies from NPM.

Trying to explain that NPM was returning a status code intended as an April Fools joke and which was never meant to see the light of production was quite difficult

https://github.com/npm/npm/issues/20791

I should really get around to how I discovered this 6 years ago and still nothing done about it

Whenever something like this comes up I usually have to tap the sign (and the original report)

NPM is not "Node Package Manager". https://www.npmjs.com/package/npm

> which can be overriden with env setting

Support for this is not great. Lots of packages still don't support this properly. My experience matches the 2015 comment https://github.com/npm/npm/issues/775#issuecomment-71294085

> Not sure why "symlinks" would be involved.

If you make your node_modules a symlink, multiple packages will fail. Even if you're not interested in doing that, others are.

> What NPM does is leaps and bounds ahead

Unless you change your node / gyp version. It doesn't really have a concept of runtime version. You can restrict it, but not have two concurrent versions if they conflict.

[email protected] was released in May 2017 and it seems to address many of the issues that Yarn aims to solve. Do keep an eye on it!

I think it's had been supposed to do that since forever. Apart from some bug in npm 5.3. Are you sure your package-lock versions actually conform to the semver ranges in your package.json?