PicoBlaze_Simulator_in_JS VS ArithmeticExpressionCompiler

For my Bachelor thesis, I made a PicoBlaze Assembler and Emulator in JavaScript. I've discussed it on many Internet forums, and quite a few people have complained that the core of my assembler is hard-to-follow due to lots of if-branchings. So, what is the other way of making the core of the assembler?

Well, I've never used any CSS framework. And my largest HTML5 project, a 3'500-lines-long PicoBlaze Simulator, uses no JavaScript framework either. The only JavaScript framework I've ever used is JQuery, which I used for my 2'000-lines-of-code flashcard game. I haven't yet managed to get an entry-level job, though, so maybe it's not a good idea to take advice from me.

By the way, what do you think about my other project, PicoBlaze Simulator?

My first assembler+simulator is 3'000 lines of code.

Well, for my AEC-to-x86 compiler, I provide a ZIP file with the source code (together with the MIT-licenced Duktape, which is necessary for my compiler to work, as the core of it is written in JavaScript, and also the source code of example programs), which I recommend to download. I also provide, for people who are willing to risk getting malware from my computer, a ZIP file containing the compiler executables for various OS-es as well as sources and executables of the example programs (but not the source code of Duktape and the part of my compiler written in C programming language).

I have made some GAS executable files to be executed on Windows, you can download them here (the EXE files are for Windows): https://github.com/FlatAssembler/ArithmeticExpressionCompiler/raw/master/recursive_HybridSort/RecursiveHybridSortExecutables.zip

Maybe the way I have done that in my web-app, by tokenizing, parsing and then interpreting the string: https://flatassembler.github.io/compiler.html

A thing I have done with my knowledge of assembly language is that I have made a compiler for my programming language that targets x86: https://flatassembler.github.io/compiler.html

And who cares about 8086? Probably not a single modern device has it. The earliest computer I had, running Windows 98, had Intel Celeron processor, which is, from the perspective of an assembly-language programmer, the same as i686 (Intel Pentium Pro). The assembly code that the compiler for my programming language produces will run on all computers you care about, and many so old you do not care: https://flatassembler.github.io/compiler.html

I have used FlatAssembler and GNU Assembler. Those are assemblers that the compiler for my programming language uses to target x86: https://flatassembler.github.io/compiler.html I also have a bit of experience with Microsoft Macro Assembler.

Antivirus software, for some reason, failed to detect the malware. I don't fully understand why. They misdetect a ton of innocent programs as malware (system files necessary for booting, BoringSSL, Motorola's Bluetooth drivers, the compiler for my programming language...), so it is instinctual to think they will detect an actual malware, but apparently that is not what happens.