OpenSourceChess VS morphy

I went with a single set of recursive functions for the moves: https://github.com/herval/OpenSourceChess/blob/main/Assets/Scripts/Piece.cs The nice thing is I can model any movement with this (except something crazy like a hypothetical piece that’d bounce on walls)

Its actually mentioned in the readme: https://github.com/herval/OpenSourceChess

I'm making an open source Chess game, mostly to learn Unity: https://github.com/herval/OpenSourceChess

Publishing binaries on itch as it evolves too: https://herval.itch.io/open-source-chess

I'm forcing myself to work one hour a day on it (at least two Pomodoros) no matter what, which is a nice change of pace to my day job (in management), and really adds up over time. I gave up on starting games many times in the past, because it always felt so overwhelming to start from a blank page, and I'm already starting to build up the understanding to tackle on some actually more original game next :-)

This is so true but my biggest struggle. Everything I have just shipped before I thought it was ready did really well, yet I still struggle to do it. I built my own static site generator, which I use for my own blog: https://github.com/kiramclean/morphy

I need to at least add documentation, and obviously there's a million other things I think I need before I tell anyone else about it.

I recently set up code coverage reporting with Codecov for a Clojure project of mine that uses tools.deps and builds on CircleCI. It turned out to be pretty easy but the documentation for the various parts was a bit ambiguous, so I wrote down the steps here in case you're looking to do the same. You can see all the changes it took together in context in this commit where I set it up for my project.