CrossHair
infer
CrossHair | infer | |
---|---|---|
8 | 42 | |
948 | 14,708 | |
- | 0.3% | |
9.2 | 9.9 | |
12 days ago | 7 days ago | |
Python | OCaml | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
CrossHair
-
Try CrossHair while working other Python projects
Writing some Python for Hacktoberfest? Try out CrossHair while you do that and get credit for a blog post too! https://github.com/pschanely/CrossHair/issues/173
-
What are some amazing, great python external modules, libraries to explore?
CrossHair, Hypothesis, and Mutmut for advanced testing.
-
Formal Verification Methods in industry
When you say "formal verification methods", what kind of techniques are you interested in? While using interactive theorem provers will most likely not become very widespread, there are plenty of tools that use formal techniques to give more correctness guarantees. These tools might give some guarantees, but do not guarantee complete functional correctness. WireGuard (VPN tunnel) is I think a very interesting application where they verified the protocol. There are also some tools in use, e.g. Mythril and CrossHair, that focus on detecting bugs using symbolic execution. There's also INFER from Facebook/Meta which tries to verify memory safety automatically. The following GitHub repo might also interest you, it lists some companies that use formal methods: practical-fm
-
Klara: Python automatic test generations and static analysis library
The main difference that Klara bring to the table, compared to similar tool like pynguin and Crosshair is that the analysis is entirely static, meaning that no user code will be executed, and you can easily extend the test generation strategy via plugin loading (e.g. the options arg to the Component object returned from function above is not needed for test coverage).
-
Pynguin – Allow developers to generate Python unit tests automatically
Just in case you are looking for an alternative approach: if you write contracts in your code, you might also consider crosshair [1] or icontract-hypothesis [2]. If your function/method does not need any pre-conditions then the the type annotations can be directly used.
(I'm one of the authors of icontract-hypothesis.)
[1] https://github.com/pschanely/CrossHair
[2] https://github.com/mristin/icontract-hypothesis
-
Programming in Z3 by learning to think like a compiler
There's a tool for verification of Python programs based on contracts which uses Z3: https://github.com/pschanely/CrossHair
You can use it as part of your CI or during the development (there's even a neat "watch" mode, akin to auto-correct).
- Diff the behavior of two Python functions
-
Finding Software Bugs Using Symbolic Execution
Looking at some of your SMT-based projects, I'd love to compare your SMT solver notes with my mine from working on https://github.com/pschanely/CrossHair
Sadly, there aren't a lot of resources on how to use SMT solvers well.
infer
-
An Introduction to Temporal Logic (With Applications to Concurrency Problems)
I think most development occurs on problems that can't be formally modeled anyway. Most developers work on things like, "can you add this feature to the e-commerce site? And can the pop-up be blue?" which isn't really model-able.
But that's not to say that formal methods are useless! We can still prove some interesting aspects of programs -- for example, that every lock that gets acquired later gets released. I think tools like Infer[0] could become common in the coming years.
[0]: https://fbinfer.com/
- Should I Rust or should I Go
-
Enforcing Memory Safety?
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code.
-
Interesting ocaml mention in buck2 by fb
Meta/Facebook are long time OCaml users, their logo is on the OCaml website. Their static analysis tool and its predecessor are both written in OCaml.
-
CISA Director Easterly's comments about cyber security. Agree or disagree?
Then this idea that the US government will tell tech companies how to write secure software. Let's get this straight, the private sector, especially big tech is miles ahead of US government in this regard. Microsoft literally invented threat modelling and modern exploit mitigations. Facebook has the best appsec processes pretty much in the whole world, including their own cutting edge code analyzer. AWS uses formal verification everywhere. Meanwhile the US government itself runs mission-critical systems that's almost literally held together by bubble gum and toothpicks. Maybe they could dial down the arrogance a tad, get their own shit together, learn how this cyber stuff is actually done and only then try lecturing everyone else.
-
A plan for cybersecurity and grid safety
Efforts: Dependabot, CodeQL, Coverity, facebook's Infer tool, etc
-
A quick look at free C++ static analysis tools
I notice there isn't fbinfer. It's pretty cool, and is used for this library.
-
silly guy
"Move fast, break stuff" is a great approach when you aren't pushing the broken bits to production. Fuck, even Facebook, the big "move fast, break stuff" company, uses tools to detect errors in its continuous integration toolchain. https://fbinfer.com/
- OCaml 5.0 Multicore is out
-
Beyond Functional Programming: The Verse Programming Language (Epic Games' new language with Simon Peyton Jones)
TBH, there's a non-zero amount of non-"ivory tower" tools you may have used that are written in functional languages. Say, Pandoc or Shellcheck are written in Haskell; Infer and Flow are written in OCaml. RabbitMQ and Whatsapp are implemented in Erlang (FB Messenger was too, originally; they switched to the C++ servers later). Twitter backend is (or was, at least) written in Scala.
What are some alternatives?
pynguin - The PYthoN General UnIt Test geNerator is a test-generation tool for Python
SonarQube - Continuous Inspection
icontract-hypothesis - Combine contracts and automatic testing.
Spotbugs - SpotBugs is FindBugs' successor. A tool for static analysis to look for bugs in Java code.
angr - A powerful and user-friendly binary analysis platform!
Error Prone - Catch common Java mistakes as compile-time errors
alive2 - Automatic verification of LLVM optimizations
FindBugs - The new home of the FindBugs project
klee - KLEE Symbolic Execution Engine
PMD - An extensible multilanguage static code analyzer.
miasm - Reverse engineering framework in Python
Checkstyle - Checkstyle is a development tool to help programmers write Java code that adheres to a coding standard. By default it supports the Google Java Style Guide and Sun Code Conventions, but is highly configurable. It can be invoked with an ANT task and a command line program.