AdNauseam
anti-adblock-killer
AdNauseam | anti-adblock-killer | |
---|---|---|
40 | 72 | |
4,393 | 5,892 | |
- | - | |
0.0 | 0.0 | |
28 days ago | about 1 year ago | |
JavaScript | JavaScript | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
AdNauseam
-
YouTube's Ad Blocker Crackdown Is Getting Harder to Dodge
It does not actually clicks on the ads. It sends the request to ad server but does not execute any response from the server, so it's safe to run
https://github.com/dhowe/AdNauseam/wiki/FAQ#how-does-adnause...
- AdNauseam: uBlock Origin fork silently clicking ads on behalf of users
-
AdNauseam: uBlock Origin fork silently clicking ads
>https://github.com/dhowe/AdNauseam/wiki/FAQ#how-does-adnause...
>AdNauseam 'clicks' Ads by issuing an HTTP request to the URL to which they lead. In current versions the is done via an XMLHttpRequest (or AJAX request) issued in a background process. This lightweight request signals a 'click' on the server responsible for the Ad, but does so without opening any additional windows or pages on your computer. Further it allows AdNauseam to safely receive and discard the resulting response data, rather than executing it in the browser, thus preventing a range of potential security problems (ransomware, rogue Javascript or Flash code, XSS-attacks, etc.) caused by malfunctioning or malicious Ads. Although it is completely safe, AdNauseam's clicking behaviour can be de-activated in the settings panel.
Isn't this easily detectable? XHRs are easily detectable through various headers, so it's trivial to filter out the fake traffic from this extension. Failing that, thanks to ad fraud there's a whole industry of bot/ad fraud detection firms using browser fingerprinting and behavioral analysis to detect fake ad clicks. I have no doubt that an extension that's "clicking" on every ad using XHR is going to get detected and filtered.
- Noiszy: A browser plugin that creates meaningless web data – digital “noise.”
-
Subreddits have proposed a blackout from June 12-14. Third party users should join them and avoid Reddit during that period.
I'd think it's infeasible for advertisers to regularly audit third-party apps on reddit's behalf to make sure the ads they're paying to display aren't being requested but cosmetically hidden or even shadow-clicked. I'm sincerely curious if there are any example platforms that do this with their API; I can't find anything after a search.
-
take your daily medicine guys
What is your opinion on AdNauseam?
-
uBlock Origin/Ad Nauseam and YouTube
Please use this page to report issues or ask questions about Ad Nauseam. This specific issue has already been addressed:
-
Lifelong Chrome user switching to Firefox, are there any extensions that are a MUST on the browser?
Other than that, Libredirect and AdNauseam to be pretty neat. Allows me to avoid using certain sites directly and when I do, I mess with their ads engagement enough. A bit petty, but I'll take what I can get.
- The vast majority of us are being tracked with surveillance tech. These are the systems you need to know about
anti-adblock-killer
-
Chrome's next weapon in the War on Ad Blockers: Slower extension updates
So, for most of the history of advertising, you didn't have a choice. Advertising was a part of someone else's property that would ambush[0] you before you could even ignore it. Internet advertising is an outlier in that it happens on your property. You ask for a web page, the web site sends back the page with a bunch of JavaScript that tries to run an ad auction on your computer, then your browser extensions delete the JavaScript, then another bit of JavaScript sent by the web site detects this and deletes the content, except no because your extension also defeated the antitamper script, except no because the web site legally threatened your ad blocker with billions of dollars in litigation for breaking the "don't rip DVDs" law.
I'm not kidding about that, BTW[1][2][3]. There is a silent and ongoing effort by everyone - including ad companies - to appropriate your physical property with their intellectual property[4]. You see, on the totem pole of capitalist legitimacy, physical ownership is actually really weak. There's all sorts of government-granted monopolies that can be traded like property[5], but let you bulldoze lesser ownership over physical objects. You might own your computer, but I own the content, so I own your computer for as long as my content is somewhere on it.
Talking about fundamental rights is interesting. Right now, at least in the US, people have a fundamental right to advertise - it's called the 1st Amendment. We can't even have functional campaign contribution laws because SCOTUS demands that billionaires have a god-given right to spend their billions shouting over everyone else in campaign ads. Several other fundamental rights mean you have the right to ignore shouty ads, but you don't have the right to shut the advertisers up. Likewise, the right to refuse ad exposure online is implied by the fact that the website runs on your computer. But other rights - such as the right to control copies of your speech - can negate that same implication.
Anyway, this is why I think we should bring back the Boston Strangler[6]. Thank you for coming to my TED Talk.
[0] This is separate from the concept of "ambush marketing" where you try to ride another marketer's coat tails as close as possible without violating trademark law, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambush_marketing
[1] https://digiday.com/media/adblock-plus-accuses-axel-springer...
[2] https://torrentfreak.com/dmca-used-to-remove-ad-server-url-f...
[3] Here's a longer GitHub issue/flamewar full of people debating whether or not you can apply DMCA 1201 equivalents to ad blockers: https://github.com/reek/anti-adblock-killer/issues/1034
[4] Shut up Stallman, you know what it really means. - Not Cory Doctorow
[5] I'm afraid to call them property because if I do that means the Takings clause applies and we can't ever roll back the life+70 insanity that Berne, Germany, and the EU foisted on us.
[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Valenti#Valenti_on_new_te...
- Future of adblocking on youtube?
-
So apparently YouTube is testing out blocking adblockers
On Windows, I use Anti-Adblock Killer + uBlock Origin + SponsorBlock + YouTube Enhancer (which adds many features such as granular custom speed up to 14x).
- crucify their ass
-
By pass ad block detection in website
Try Anti-Adblock Killer.
- Can i bypass Megaup disable adblock error?
- This is one of the most annoying feelings in the world
-
I just got this pop-up for the first time...doesn't seem to actually stop me yet from just clicking the x though :)
Should also be using Anti Adblock Killer
-
YouTube 2023 Upfront: Unskippable 30-Second Ads Coming to TVs
Link
- [Ad Block] Tueur anti-albloc ne fonctionne pas pour moi
What are some alternatives?
uBlock - uBlock Origin - An efficient blocker for Chromium and Firefox. Fast and lean.
fuckfuckadblock - Filters for blocking mining, pop-ups and anti-adblock bypass.
bypass-paywalls-firefox - Bypass Paywalls for Firefox android
blokada - The official repo for Blokada apps.
block - Let's make an annoyance free, better open internet, altogether!
Pi-hole - A black hole for Internet advertisements
Never-Consent - Never consent to any GDPR consent management platform
uAssets - Resources for uBlock Origin, uMatrix: static filter lists, ready-to-use rulesets, etc.
privacypossum - Privacy Possum makes tracking you less profitable
bypass-paywalls-firefox-clean
DontFuckWithPaste - Google Chrome and Firefox extension that prevents the blocking of pasting into input fields