- scratch-pdf-bot VS lance
- scratch-pdf-bot VS chatgpt-comparison-detection
- scratch-pdf-bot VS RasaGPT
- scratch-pdf-bot VS embedditor
- scratch-pdf-bot VS sycamore
- scratch-pdf-bot VS deeplake
- scratch-pdf-bot VS LMOps
- scratch-pdf-bot VS unilm
- scratch-pdf-bot VS deepsparse
- scratch-pdf-bot VS best-of-ml-python
Scratch-pdf-bot Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to scratch-pdf-bot
-
lance
Modern columnar data format for ML and LLMs implemented in Rust. Convert from parquet in 2 lines of code for 100x faster random access, vector index, and data versioning. Compatible with Pandas, DuckDB, Polars, Pyarrow, with more integrations coming..
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
RasaGPT
💬 RasaGPT is the first headless LLM chatbot platform built on top of Rasa and Langchain. Built w/ Rasa, FastAPI, Langchain, LlamaIndex, SQLModel, pgvector, ngrok, telegram
-
embedditor
⚡ GUI for editing LLM vector embeddings. No more blind chunking. Upload content in any file extension, join and split chunks, edit metadata and embedding tokens + remove stop-words and punctuation with one click, add images, and download in .veml to share it with your team.
-
sycamore
🍁 Sycamore is an LLM-powered search and analytics platform for unstructured data. (by aryn-ai)
-
deeplake
Database for AI. Store Vectors, Images, Texts, Videos, etc. Use with LLMs/LangChain. Store, query, version, & visualize any AI data. Stream data in real-time to PyTorch/TensorFlow. https://activeloop.ai
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
scratch-pdf-bot reviews and mentions
-
Show HN: Lance is a Rust-based alternative to Parquet for ML data
I initially built this same "chat with PDFs" prototype with LangChain and qdrant. I then rebuilt it from scratch for the sake of learning and comparison.
Some context: I've been a jack-of-all-trades data scientist / machine learning engineer for the past 15 years (officially titled as an MLE the last four years).
I share that only because I think it plays a role in how I'm typically accustomed to working.
1. I found LangChain to be overkill for this use-case. While it might allow some to move more quickly when building, I found it to be cumbersome. My suspicion is this is largely because of my background - I understand how to build much of what's "under the hood" in LangChain. Because of this, I think it felt overly abstracted and I found the docs difficult to navigate and sometimes incomplete.
2. I used Qdrant via their docker image and it was simple to setup and start using. I didn't try to push the limits with it, so I can't say anything about performance. Because Qdrant runs as an http service, I found that it didn't fit well into my workflow - I'm accustomed to being able to visually inspect my data inside the interpreter, debugging, trying out commands, interacting and experimenting with my results, etc. Again, my suspicion is this is my own bias in how I typically work. Qdrant otherwise seemed very nice.
3. LanceDB felt powerful yet lightweight, and fit well into my workflow. It was far more intuitive for me. It was as if sqlite, the python data ecosystem, and a vector database had a child and named it LanceDB. Under the hood, it's built on Apache Arrow and integrates nicely with pandas, allowing me to seamlessly go from LanceDB table on disk, to pandas dataframe, and into some analysis or investigation of my LanceDB query results. This line [1] is a great example of why I liked it. This feels nicer to me than the world of API params and HTTP requests.
1. https://github.com/gjreda/scratch-pdf-bot/blob/main/gpt_pdf_...
Stats
The primary programming language of scratch-pdf-bot is Python.
Popular Comparisons
Sponsored