- platform_specific_components VS modm
- platform_specific_components VS shournal
- platform_specific_components VS stm32-bootloader
- platform_specific_components VS GuiLite
- platform_specific_components VS gainput
- platform_specific_components VS IoT-For-Beginners
- platform_specific_components VS nf-interpreter
- platform_specific_components VS example-modules
Platform_specific_components Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to platform_specific_components
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
stm32-bootloader
Customizable Bootloader for STM32 microcontrollers. This example demonstrates how to perform in-application-programming of a firmware located on an external SD card with FAT32 file system.
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
platform_specific_components reviews and mentions
-
Looking into writing a CAN stack with FreeRTOS for STM32, where should I start?
Not sure what STM32 CAN peripherals you are talking about (bxCAN vs FDCAN) but if you are using bxCAN, I recommend looking at UAVCAN's implementation: https://github.com/UAVCAN/platform_specific_components since it is very simple to use (even though it claimed works with libcanard stack only but should be fine for outside purposes). I think putting RTOS on it should be simple enough. For FDCAN, the only options right now are from ST HAL or ChibiOS AFAIK.
Stats
OpenCyphal-Garage/platform_specific_components is an open source project licensed under MIT License which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of platform_specific_components is C++.
Popular Comparisons
Sponsored