Ohrrpgce Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to ohrrpgce

lone

7 296 9.7 C ohrrpgce VS lone

The standalone Linux Lisp
mxe

1 0 10.0 Makefile ohrrpgce VS mxe

MXE (M cross environment) (by rversteegen)
WorkOS

workos.com sponsored

The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
tools_toolchain_vs2017bt_1416

1 12 10.0 C++ ohrrpgce VS tools_toolchain_vs2017bt_1416

Visual Studio Build Tools 2017 v15.9.7
raylib-freebasic

1 19 3.4 FreeBasic ohrrpgce VS raylib-freebasic

FreeBasic bindings for raylib
Flag-Wars

4 5 0.9 FreeBasic ohrrpgce VS Flag-Wars

Source code for the game Flag Wars made in FreeBASIC
Player

15 940 9.1 C++ ohrrpgce VS Player

RPG Maker 2000/2003 and EasyRPG games interpreter (by EasyRPG)
Ebiten

53 9,831 9.8 Go ohrrpgce VS Ebiten

Ebitengine - A dead simple 2D game engine for Go
InfluxDB

www.influxdata.com sponsored

Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
nCine

11 962 6.0 C++ ohrrpgce VS nCine

A cross-platform 2D game engine

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better ohrrpgce alternative or higher similarity.

Suggest an alternative to ohrrpgce

ohrrpgce reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of ohrrpgce. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-07-09.

The 90s Developer Starter Pack
4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 9 Jul 2023

Yes, I guess I could do that, then maybe I can get it upstreamed.
However I was misremembering a bit and misspoke before both about how easy it's been to support Windows 95 (it was easy up until a few mingw-w64 releases ago... except for spawning processes) and how recent my mingw-w64 is (I'm using 7.0.0, 3.5 years old, and simply haven't tried anything newer). Also I have no idea the minimum Windows targetted by mingw-w64 actually is, they don't say. I think they don't actually care about Windows 9x support, they just never did anything to break it before 6.0.0. So I doubt they'd accept such a patch.
The most important trick was you have to use a build of mingw-w64 with 'win32' rather than 'posix' threading ([1], and the rest of that thread is relevant too):
> the 'win32' threading support in mingw-w64 is the original one and supports all 32-bit Windows, while 'posix' threading (winpthreads) is a recent addition which is necessary to support C++11 mutexes and threads, but has higher system requirements. ... That's why mxe switched to posix threads by default in 2019.
[1] https://github.com/ohrrpgce/ohrrpgce/issues/1241#issuecommen...