The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning. Learn more →
Mi-cho-coq Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to mi-cho-coq
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
-
juvix
Discontinued Juvix empowers developers to write code in a high-level, functional language, compile it to gas-efficient output VM instructions, and formally verify the safety of their contracts prior to deployment and execution.
-
tezedge
Tezos node/shell in Rust. Unfortunately dev has ceased. If you are interested in resurrecting, please contact @drchrispinnock
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
mi-cho-coq reviews and mentions
- Every link DEVs interested on Tezos should know
-
12 reasons Cardano can't scale in 2022
There are similarities between the promises made by Cardano and what you find in Tezos: * proof-of-stake L1s * on-chain voting: Voltaire for Cardano vs periodic elections on Tezos (already 8 important upgrades of the protocol that were voted for, with the Foundation abstaining!) * formal verification of contracts and the chain itself: mentioned here for Cardano vs several projects in Tezos (Mi-Cho-Coq, foobar.land, both using the Coq proof assistant) * ongoing work on L2s: Hydra for Cardano vs Deku, zkRollups and optimistic rollups as well (a bit similar to Arbitrum IIRC).
-
Formal Verification: Tezos’s Feature Nobody Talks About
We are not working with LIGO to verify smart contracts, more with Mi-Cho-Coq which aims to verify smart contracts directly at the Michelson level. Using Mi-Cho-Coq it is possible to verify the Michelson output of LIGO or SmartPy. I heard LIGO people also have projects to do verification directly at the LIGO's level or verify the implementation of the LIGO compiler.
-
Front running and general architecture?
Formal verification for smart contracts. Many (Not all) categories of vulnerabilities can be avoided that way. See fe: https://medium.com/coinmonks/verify-a-smart-contract-with-archetype-6e0ea548e2da or https://gitlab.com/nomadic-labs/mi-cho-coq which can be used on any michelson code.
- About Michelson design
-
ELI5 This “superior tech” Tezos has
The link to the Coq formalization of Michelson, to formally verify smart-contracts: https://gitlab.com/nomadic-labs/mi-cho-coq
-
Supporting EVM, WASM Bitcoin Script, etc.
Web assembly is stack-based and there are tools like KWasm for formal verification - so a move to WASM is a more likely candidate... but Michelson is a very capable and verifiable stack based low-level language too. https://gitlab.com/nomadic-labs/mi-cho-coq/
-
A note from our sponsor - WorkOS
workos.com | 25 Apr 2024
Stats
Sponsored