mi-cho-coq
factor
Our great sponsors
mi-cho-coq | factor | |
---|---|---|
7 | 59 | |
- | 1,583 | |
- | 1.0% | |
- | 9.8 | |
- | 2 days ago | |
Factor | ||
- | BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
mi-cho-coq
- Every link DEVs interested on Tezos should know
-
12 reasons Cardano can't scale in 2022
There are similarities between the promises made by Cardano and what you find in Tezos: * proof-of-stake L1s * on-chain voting: Voltaire for Cardano vs periodic elections on Tezos (already 8 important upgrades of the protocol that were voted for, with the Foundation abstaining!) * formal verification of contracts and the chain itself: mentioned here for Cardano vs several projects in Tezos (Mi-Cho-Coq, foobar.land, both using the Coq proof assistant) * ongoing work on L2s: Hydra for Cardano vs Deku, zkRollups and optimistic rollups as well (a bit similar to Arbitrum IIRC).
-
Formal Verification: Tezos’s Feature Nobody Talks About
We are not working with LIGO to verify smart contracts, more with Mi-Cho-Coq which aims to verify smart contracts directly at the Michelson level. Using Mi-Cho-Coq it is possible to verify the Michelson output of LIGO or SmartPy. I heard LIGO people also have projects to do verification directly at the LIGO's level or verify the implementation of the LIGO compiler.
-
Front running and general architecture?
Formal verification for smart contracts. Many (Not all) categories of vulnerabilities can be avoided that way. See fe: https://medium.com/coinmonks/verify-a-smart-contract-with-archetype-6e0ea548e2da or https://gitlab.com/nomadic-labs/mi-cho-coq which can be used on any michelson code.
- About Michelson design
-
ELI5 This “superior tech” Tezos has
The link to the Coq formalization of Michelson, to formally verify smart-contracts: https://gitlab.com/nomadic-labs/mi-cho-coq
-
Supporting EVM, WASM Bitcoin Script, etc.
Web assembly is stack-based and there are tools like KWasm for formal verification - so a move to WASM is a more likely candidate... but Michelson is a very capable and verifiable stack based low-level language too. https://gitlab.com/nomadic-labs/mi-cho-coq/
factor
- An Exploration of SBCL Internals (2020)
-
My history with Forth, and stack machines
My impression so far is (in general), Forth are practically limited to doing embedded/microcontroller development.
For us, web/mobile/desktop app devs, beside:
- 8th (https://8th-dev.com)
- Factor (https://factorcode.org)
Any suggestion which implementation we should look for?
- Forth: The programming language that writes itself: The Web Page
- Retro: A Modern, Pragmatic Forth
-
Pharo 11, the pure object-oriented language and environment is released!
Factor is also very much worth a look. Forth-style syntax, but with many of the ideas from CL and Smalltalk as well. In fact as a CL fan, I was very impressed by it. It's also quite "batteries included" a la Python.
-
The toki pona of programming.
Otherwise, and more seriously, I'm not completely sure variables are needed. Factor is quite usable (it's my favorite go-to language if I quickly need to script something), and mostly doesn't have them.
- Forth as an intermediate language
-
A Dynamic Forth Compiler for WebAssembly
There's a note on the page from 2022-08-19, that a lot has been added to it. It also links to the github page[1] for the up-to-date changes.
I am a Lisp, April, APL/J/BQE, and Forth[2] aficionado. I did some file munging programs in Factor back in 2012 at my job to sort through theater attendance logs in Word to compile statistics.
[1] https://github.com/remko/waforth
[2] https://factorcode.org/
-
What the hell is Forth? (2019)
Is there any "battery-included" ANS Forth (more or less like Python/Go) which provides access to concurrency, networking, database, GUI, etc?
Not an embedded device programmer, but mostly deals with frontend apps, and occasionally backend, so those are very relevant to me.
Or perhaps use "non-traditional" Forths like 8th (https://8th-dev.com) or Factor (https://factorcode.org)?
-
-🎄- 2022 Day 2 Solutions -🎄-
Here's my day two solution using Factor
What are some alternatives?
juvix - Juvix empowers developers to write code in a high-level, functional language, compile it to gas-efficient output VM instructions, and formally verify the safety of their contracts prior to deployment and execution.
jonesforth - Mirror of JONESFORTH
cardano-ledger - The ledger implementation and specifications of the Cardano blockchain.
durexforth - Modern C64 Forth
hicdex
bondi - source code for the bondi programming language
CIPs
Raylib-CsLo - autogen bindings to Raylib 4.x and convenience wrappers on top. Requires use of `unsafe`
tzkt - 😼 Awesome Tezos blockchain indexer and API
oil - Oils is our upgrade path from bash to a better language and runtime. It's also for Python and JavaScript users who avoid shell!
Conseil - Query API and indexer for Tezos and other decentralized platforms.
batteries-included - Batteries Included project