mi-cho-coq
Conseil
Our great sponsors
mi-cho-coq | Conseil | |
---|---|---|
7 | 4 | |
- | 91 | |
- | - | |
- | 0.0 | |
- | over 1 year ago | |
Scala | ||
- | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
mi-cho-coq
- Every link DEVs interested on Tezos should know
-
12 reasons Cardano can't scale in 2022
There are similarities between the promises made by Cardano and what you find in Tezos: * proof-of-stake L1s * on-chain voting: Voltaire for Cardano vs periodic elections on Tezos (already 8 important upgrades of the protocol that were voted for, with the Foundation abstaining!) * formal verification of contracts and the chain itself: mentioned here for Cardano vs several projects in Tezos (Mi-Cho-Coq, foobar.land, both using the Coq proof assistant) * ongoing work on L2s: Hydra for Cardano vs Deku, zkRollups and optimistic rollups as well (a bit similar to Arbitrum IIRC).
-
Formal Verification: Tezos’s Feature Nobody Talks About
We are not working with LIGO to verify smart contracts, more with Mi-Cho-Coq which aims to verify smart contracts directly at the Michelson level. Using Mi-Cho-Coq it is possible to verify the Michelson output of LIGO or SmartPy. I heard LIGO people also have projects to do verification directly at the LIGO's level or verify the implementation of the LIGO compiler.
-
Front running and general architecture?
Formal verification for smart contracts. Many (Not all) categories of vulnerabilities can be avoided that way. See fe: https://medium.com/coinmonks/verify-a-smart-contract-with-archetype-6e0ea548e2da or https://gitlab.com/nomadic-labs/mi-cho-coq which can be used on any michelson code.
- About Michelson design
-
ELI5 This “superior tech” Tezos has
The link to the Coq formalization of Michelson, to formally verify smart-contracts: https://gitlab.com/nomadic-labs/mi-cho-coq
-
Supporting EVM, WASM Bitcoin Script, etc.
Web assembly is stack-based and there are tools like KWasm for formal verification - so a move to WASM is a more likely candidate... but Michelson is a very capable and verifiable stack based low-level language too. https://gitlab.com/nomadic-labs/mi-cho-coq/
Conseil
- The September 2022 release of the Conseil indexer for the Kathmandu protocol is out
-
Every link DEVs interested on Tezos should know
Consiel Indexer (also just check Cryptonomic's repos) https://github.com/Cryptonomic/Conseil
- Release November 2021 Conseil Release · Cryptonomic/Conseil
- April 2021 Conseil Release · Cryptonomic/Conseil
What are some alternatives?
juvix - Juvix empowers developers to write code in a high-level, functional language, compile it to gas-efficient output VM instructions, and formally verify the safety of their contracts prior to deployment and execution.
slick-additions - Helpers for the Slick database access library
cardano-ledger - The ledger implementation and specifications of the Cardano blockchain.
pytezos - 🐍 Python SDK for Tezos | Michelson VM in Python
hicdex
build.teztools.io - Build blockchain powered applications with scripts and tools built against teztools.io infrastructure
CIPs
Akka - Build highly concurrent, distributed, and resilient message-driven applications on the JVM
tzkt - 😼 Awesome Tezos blockchain indexer and API
tezos
factor - Factor programming language