filter

Simple apply/filter/reduce package. (by robpike)

Filter Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to filter

  1. rust

    2,850 filter VS rust

    Empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.

  2. InfluxDB

    InfluxDB – Built for High-Performance Time Series Workloads. InfluxDB 3 OSS is now GA. Transform, enrich, and act on time series data directly in the database. Automate critical tasks and eliminate the need to move data externally. Download now.

    InfluxDB logo
  3. go

    2,276 filter VS go

    The Go programming language

  4. julia

    369 filter VS julia

    The Julia Programming Language

  5. v

    235 filter VS v

    Simple, fast, safe, compiled language for developing maintainable software. Compiles itself in <1s with zero library dependencies. Supports automatic C => V translation. https://vlang.io

  6. tokio

    222 filter VS tokio

    A runtime for writing reliable asynchronous applications with Rust. Provides I/O, networking, scheduling, timers, ...

  7. actix-web

    Actix Web is a powerful, pragmatic, and extremely fast web framework for Rust.

  8. Rocket

    164 filter VS Rocket

    A web framework for Rust.

  9. Stream

    Stream - Scalable APIs for Chat, Feeds, Moderation, & Video. Stream helps developers build engaging apps that scale to millions with performant and flexible Chat, Feeds, Moderation, and Video APIs and SDKs powered by a global edge network and enterprise-grade infrastructure.

    Stream logo
  10. meson

    113 filter VS meson

    The Meson Build System

  11. hyper

    109 filter VS hyper

    An HTTP library for Rust (by hyperium)

  12. diesel

    89 filter VS diesel

    A safe, extensible ORM and Query Builder for Rust

  13. Weaviate

    82 filter VS Weaviate

    Weaviate is an open-source vector database that stores both objects and vectors, allowing for the combination of vector search with structured filtering with the fault tolerance and scalability of a cloud-native database​.

  14. Wails

    66 filter VS Wails

    Create beautiful applications using Go

  15. lo

    65 filter VS lo

    💥 A Lodash-style Go library based on Go 1.18+ Generics (map, filter, contains, find...)

  16. ggez

    50 filter VS ggez

    Rust library to create a Good Game Easily

  17. GJSON

    40 filter VS GJSON

    Get JSON values quickly - JSON parser for Go

  18. Gorgonia

    Gorgonia is a library that helps facilitate machine learning in Go.

  19. lettre

    10 filter VS lettre

    a mailer library for Rust

  20. FuncFrog

    Stream api (kind of) implementation for go, other useful functions and packages to use go in a functional way

  21. glinq

    Go port of DotNet LINQ using generics introduced in Go 1.18

  22. ply

    3 filter VS ply

    Painless polymorphism (by lukechampine)

  23. SaaSHub

    SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives

    SaaSHub logo
NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better filter alternative or higher similarity.

filter discussion

Log in or Post with

filter reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of filter. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-17.
  • Querying and transforming object graphs in Go
    6 projects | /r/golang | 17 May 2023
    Here’s Rob Pike’s (one of the original Go designers) attempt to “see what the hubbub is all about”: https://github.com/robpike/filter
  • Future language enhancements to go
    6 projects | /r/golang | 13 May 2023
  • Why Golang instead of Kotlin?
    2 projects | /r/golang | 16 Apr 2023
    I find the language really solid but asking on r/golang is quite an adventure. It's extremely distant from go's spirit, the grammar is even more rich than Rust. Typical example: let, run, with, apply, and also - they all practically do the same but with a different scope of this and return value. Just looking at the flow API can get your head spinning. To illustrate how much it's completely the opposite of Go, see how Rob Pike pokes fun at map/filter and tells people they should not use it . I guess you can't force all developers to adhere to this mental model, but that's about it, but that's about it, technical arguments are irrelevant except for extremely niche concerns about memory and startup time
  • Supporting the Use of Rust in the Chromium Project
    11 projects | /r/rust | 13 Jan 2023
    I mean sure, let's praise the ergonomics of channels and the reliability of maps. As for datastructures, we already have datastructures at home . They just work fine. Nobody needs more than that because rob pike told us so
  • Why isn’t Go used in AI/ML?
    8 projects | /r/golang | 23 Dec 2022
    Go will never have a map/filter syntax, to the point rob pike even makes fun of it , do you really want to use it for that kind of domain ?
  • State of Rust for web backends
    11 projects | /r/rust | 20 Dec 2022
    Also since generators are mentioned I recently came across this rob pike moment, he implemented a reduce function that takes and returns all interface{} types and uses reflection to check if the call is valid at runtime - that's the most typical Go that can ever be written in 40 lines - all that to make the point that it's useless. Such a great spirit. https://github.com/robpike/filter
  • Go 1.21 may have a clear(x) builtin and there's an interesting reason why
    2 projects | /r/programmingcirclejerk | 21 Nov 2022
  • What necessary packages or functions that Go doesn't have?
    6 projects | /r/golang | 4 Nov 2022
  • Golang is so fun to write
    3 projects | /r/golang | 21 Oct 2022
    A few points that stood out to me: error handling in Go is generally pretty good. It's much more performant compared to throwing exceptions and the high frequency of error handling helps a lot with debugging and avoiding unexpected errors. What you've described as "poor OOP'ish" is partly true, yes Go does poor OOP, because it doesn't try to do OOP. The language favours composition over inheritance. Strongly applying OOP concepts in Go is simply not using the language in its intended way. For implicit interfaces, it's completely fair that you don't like them, but it's not a disadvantage of the language. I for one find implicit interfaces very intuitive and feel it's the right way for it to be done. No function overloading and lack of ternary operations is absolutely intentional, both of these are overcome by writing more expressive code, which is not a bad thing. Similarly with no built in map/filter/find, these can be achieved using for-loops. Reference https://github.com/robpike/filter for Rob Pike's implementation of filter, stating in the readme that there's not much use for it and to just use for-loops instead. Last thing, enums are expressed using iota: https://go.dev/ref/spec#Iota
  • Lies we tell ourselves to keep using Golang
    7 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 29 Apr 2022
    > I didn't get that desire for purity that you gleaned from it.

    'Folks who develop an allergic reaction to "big balls of mutable state without sum types" tend to gravitate towards languages that gives them control over mutability, lifetimes, and lets them build abstractions.'

    This mutability argument is present throughout the article. Seems like nothing sans Rust or niche functional languages is enough.

    > Nil pointer exceptions, for example, don't have to exist anymore..

    The language most notorious for those is Java due to almost everything being passed via a nullable reference. When everything can be nullable, how can you know where to check for it? Go addresses this to an extent by explicitly separating pointers from values. Values are the default and cannot be nil, so the opportunity for null dereferences is greatly diminished. It's not a perfect solution, but it's not nothing either.

    > and yet they do in Go because they couldn't be bothered to add sum types.

    Damn those lazy Go devs!

    > Its type system is barely a step above a dynamic language.

    Turns out even a basic type system is a huge improvement over none. Just being able to restrict values to concrete types goes a long way.

    > You have to write the same imperative looping code over and over because Rob Pike would rather just use a for loop than something mildly expressive like map or filter (https://github.com/robpike/filter).

    There are arguments to be made either way, but I definitely agree generics (along with iterators) should have been there since day 1.

    > Every function that does meaningful work is littered with if err != nil { return err }.

    One big positive of this that I don't see in other languages is every `return` in a function must be on the start of a line. That is, every single exit path of a function is easily findable by visually scanning

  • A note from our sponsor - Stream
    getstream.io | 9 Jul 2025
    Stream helps developers build engaging apps that scale to millions with performant and flexible Chat, Feeds, Moderation, and Video APIs and SDKs powered by a global edge network and enterprise-grade infrastructure. Learn more →

Stats

Basic filter repo stats
18
859
0.0
over 2 years ago

Sponsored
InfluxDB – Built for High-Performance Time Series Workloads
InfluxDB 3 OSS is now GA. Transform, enrich, and act on time series data directly in the database. Automate critical tasks and eliminate the need to move data externally. Download now.
www.influxdata.com

Did you know that Go is
the 4th most popular programming language
based on number of references?