The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning. Learn more →
ECMAScript 6 compatibility table Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to ECMAScript 6 compatibility table
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
-
user.js
Firefox privacy, security and anti-tracking: a comprehensive user.js template for configuration and hardening
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
multi-account-containers
Firefox Multi-Account Containers lets you keep parts of your online life separated into color-coded tabs that preserve your privacy. Cookies are separated by container, allowing you to use the web with multiple identities or accounts simultaneously.
-
todomvc
Helping you select an MV* framework - Todo apps for React.js, Ember.js, Angular, and many more
-
browserslist
🦔 Share target browsers between different front-end tools, like Autoprefixer, Stylelint and babel-preset-env
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
ECMAScript 6 compatibility table reviews and mentions
-
TypeScript Is Surprisingly OK for Compilers
http://kangax.github.io/compat-table/es6/
This page lists features from es6 (and newer versions linked at the top) along with compliance to the spec. First column is the current browser, second is babel+corejs polyfills.
Overall, babel gets about 70% of the way there.
- Яндекс Браузер не переводит видео про обучение украинских танкистов, хотя другие видео с канала МО Британии переводит нормально
-
Brett Slatkin: Why am I building a new functional programming language?
Case in point: Tail Call Optimization has been part of the JS spec since ES6, but remains completely unimplemented in all mainstream browsers/engines besides Safari[1]. For all but the most predictable inputs, you're pretty much forced to use loops where recursion would otherwise be preferable.
Additional case in point: async Iterables cannot be processed as a piped stream. You must use the for await construct, which is a shame considering the FP niceties that the Array type already provides for more traditional lists. Once again, you are forced to use an imperative construct unless you specifically want to defeat the purpose of using an Iterable in the first place by trying to convert it into an Array (... and potentially choking in the process, I might add!).
[1]: https://kangax.github.io/compat-table/es6/
- [AskJS] Is there a detailed comparison chart that shows what's supported in JavaScript ES5 versus ES6?
-
A single developer has been maintaining core.js with little recognition or support. Almost all modern single page apps use core.js. Millions of downloads and hardly any compensation
Eventually the browsers started racing to near-full ES6 compatibility. I remember following ES6 progress in realtime with articles and with compatibility tables http://kangax.github.io/compat-table/es6/ . But many people are acting like that either didn't happen, or like it was a one and done thing (despite the ESNext naming shift to avoid the focus on numbers). So we see people just hand-waving away the importance of polyfills like in this gem:
-
Tell HN: Firefox Is an awesome browser right now
> https://kangax.github.io/compat-table/es6/
Oh man this was a rough one both for FF and Chrome but Chrome did perform better slightly on cursory glance.
Thanks for providing these links, they're definitely a good rule of thumb benchmarks to test new browsers
-
My 1st website "Claw Man" written in javascript
Javascript / CSS language syntax: can see availability for Javascript here - https://kangax.github.io/compat-table/es6/
-
Is there any legitimate reasons for the javascript hate?
I say this as a JS user, but there is no singular JavaScript (realistically, it's not even JavaScript but instead ECMAScript). There is no one place to go that lays out all of what the language can or can't do the way PHP and Python do. The ECMAScript board makes recommendations, then the browsers and runtimes implement features of the recommendations. This site does a good job laying out which features are implemented for browsers and runtimes based on the flavor of the ECMAScript standard. This unique experience can be especially frustrating for someone learning JavaScript and coming from another language that does not have this problem.
- JS Polyfills - Part 1
-
[AskJS] Is there a JavaScript library that will test all ES features on your browser and tell you which it supports and which it doesn't?
https://kangax.github.io/compat-table/es6/ has a column for "current browser"
-
A note from our sponsor - WorkOS
workos.com | 26 Apr 2024
Stats
compat-table/compat-table is an open source project licensed under GNU General Public License v3.0 or later which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of ECMAScript 6 compatibility table is HTML.
Popular Comparisons
- ECMAScript 6 compatibility table VS es6-features
- ECMAScript 6 compatibility table VS Babel (Formerly 6to5)
- ECMAScript 6 compatibility table VS Traceur compiler
- ECMAScript 6 compatibility table VS es6-cheatsheet
- ECMAScript 6 compatibility table VS es6features
- ECMAScript 6 compatibility table VS Lebab
- ECMAScript 6 compatibility table VS browserslist
- ECMAScript 6 compatibility table VS javascript-cheatsheet
- ECMAScript 6 compatibility table VS MEVN-CLI
- ECMAScript 6 compatibility table VS scaffold-static
Sponsored