Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality. Learn more →
Core-js Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to core-js
-
-
-
SurveyJS
Open-Source JSON Form Builder to Create Dynamic Forms Right in Your App. With SurveyJS form UI libraries, you can build and style forms in a fully-integrated drag & drop form builder, render them in your JS app, and store form submission data in any backend, inc. PHP, ASP.NET Core, and Node.js.
-
-
-
-
-
Array.prototype.at
An ES-spec-compliant (proposed) `Array.prototype.at`shim/polyfill/replacement that works as far down as ES3.
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
-
awesome-made-by-russians
Discontinued The best open source projects that were made and mainly contributed by Russian developers
-
-
libcurl
A command line tool and library for transferring data with URL syntax, supporting DICT, FILE, FTP, FTPS, GOPHER, GOPHERS, HTTP, HTTPS, IMAP, IMAPS, LDAP, LDAPS, MQTT, POP3, POP3S, RTMP, RTMPS, RTSP, SCP, SFTP, SMB, SMBS, SMTP, SMTPS, TELNET, TFTP, WS and WSS. libcurl offers a myriad of powerful features
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ECMAScript 6 compatibility table
ECMAScript compatibility tables
-
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
core-js reviews and mentions
-
Why there may never be a libjpeg-turbo 3.1
Open source developers are not being paid. They published under licenses that allow zero cost and businesses won't pay.
If you want to write open source code for living, you have to find a business model that works. In this case, it is even under permissive license.
* code freeze - code is under open source license only a certain time after commit/release. Maybe add "support", aka you get security fixes in timely manner.
* open core - put some features behind commericial door.
* go ImageSharp way of split license. That one is fun, because MS deprecated/killed (throws exceptions on attempt to use) official image/font library and that was was intended replacement. Rather blatant offloading of costs.
This has been rehashed several time (core-js recently https://github.com/zloirock/core-js/blob/master/docs/2023-02...).
The gist of it is: Companies are not going to pay if they don't have to. That is the reality and it's not going to change.
-
I am an enthusiast of Linux. But... here is where it sucks
Open source: It sounds pretty nice. Open to everyone... But it sucks in general. People really don't care to contribute to open-source. (e.g. here). It is a really good resource for development but for people who don't know anything about development, it is not important. There needs to be some financial income / support for good open-source.
-
Why you use Nodejs and depends 95% on third party libraries which only last of a year or two and don't use something like asp.net which is maintained by Microsoft?
there is https://github.com/zloirock/core-js but is more or less a 1 guy team and he is grossly under paid and well just read this https://github.com/zloirock/core-js/blob/master/docs/2023-02-14-so-whats-next.md im shocked he still works on it
-
git-cliff is being re-licensed under the MIT & Apache 2.0
Maybe you have a plan for sustainable developer under a permissive license. But it's important to think those things through ahead of time - you don't want to end up like the poor guy in charge of core-js who carried a significant chunk of the javascript ecosystem on his shoulders, but then became the butt of jokes because he dared to ask for donations.
When you use a permissive licenses such as MIT, your software might have a better chance at becoming popular than if you had used a license that was copyleft or source-available. Except by doing so, you've essentially given up one of the biggest pieces of leverage you have as an open source developer, leverage that could have been used to make the project more sustainable. You don't want to end up like the poor guy in charge of core-js who carried a significant chunk of the javascript ecosystem on his shoulders and got jack squat in return.
-
Astral
> A lot of companies would pay actual money for some semblance of supply-chain security.
After the core-js debacle[0] earlier this year, it was evident that alot of companies actually do not care care about supply-chain security.
Those that do will happily roll their own hosted repositories that provide little to no guarantees.
[0] https://github.com/zloirock/core-js/blob/master/docs/2023-02...
-
Hackers Flood NPM with Bogus Packages Causing a DoS Attack
You missed the part where he, out of nowhere, brought up russia invasion of Ukraine while prefacing "Open-source should be out of politics", while also taking a funny stance on the subject matter long before putiny made it illegal to discredit the invasion.
- ECMAScript proposal changes from the 95th meeting of ECMA TC39
- Orosz szoftverek?
-
A note from our sponsor - InfluxDB
www.influxdata.com | 29 Mar 2024
Stats
zloirock/core-js is an open source project licensed under MIT License which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of core-js is JavaScript.