Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality. Learn more →
StreamDiffusion Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to StreamDiffusion
-
FLiPStackWeekly
FLaNK AI Weekly covering Apache NiFi, Apache Flink, Apache Kafka, Apache Spark, Apache Iceberg, Apache Ozone, Apache Pulsar, and more...
-
seatunnel
SeaTunnel is a next-generation super high-performance, distributed, massive data integration tool.
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
-
Stirling-PDF
#1 Locally hosted web application that allows you to perform various operations on PDF files
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
temporian
Temporian is an open-source Python library for preprocessing ⚡ and feature engineering 🛠 temporal data 📈 for machine learning applications 🤖
-
generative-ai-python
The Gemini API Python SDK enables developers to use Google's state-of-the-art generative AI models to build AI-powered features and applications.
-
perses
The CNCF candidate for observability visualisation. Already supports Prometheus - more data sources to come!
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
StreamDiffusion reviews and mentions
- FLaNK Weekly 31 December 2023
-
StreamDiffusion: Over 100fps Stable Diffusion on a 4090
Everyone does warmup before you measure. But measuring isn't always done right because we actually measure the GPU time only but some people naively use CPU time which is problematic because the process is asynchrenous. They have a few timing scripts though and I'm away from my GPU. There are some interesting things but they look like they know how to time. But it can also get confusing because is it considering batches or not. Some works do batch some do single. Only problem is when it isn't communicated correctly or left ambiguous.
Their paper is ambiguous unfortunately. Abstract, intro, and conclusion suggests single image by motivating with sequential generation (specifically mentioning metaverse). Experiment section says
> We note that we evaluate the throughput mainly via the average inference time per image through processing 100 images.
That implies batch along with their name Stream Batch...
Looking at the code I'm a bit confused. I'm away from my GPU so can't run. Maybe someone can let me know? This block[0] measures correctly but is using a downloaded image? Then just opens the image in the preprocess? (multi looks identical) This block[1] is using CPU? But running CPU. (there's another like this)
So I'm quite a bit confused tbh.
[0] https://github.com/cumulo-autumn/StreamDiffusion/blob/03e2a7...
[1] https://github.com/cumulo-autumn/StreamDiffusion/blob/03e2a7...
- StreamDiffusion: A Pipeline-Level Solution for Real-Time Interactive Generation
-
A note from our sponsor - InfluxDB
www.influxdata.com | 29 Apr 2024
Stats
cumulo-autumn/StreamDiffusion is an open source project licensed under Apache License 2.0 which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of StreamDiffusion is Python.
Sponsored