Why are most of Rustfmt features unstable?

This page summarizes the projects mentioned and recommended in the original post on /r/rust

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
  • rustfmt

    Format Rust code

    I could list all the tracking issues for them like for control_brace_style but honestly I feel as that would be rude and that is not my intention here. But if you want you can scroll through their configuration page and see which features are stable. I'm not quite sure if I can use these even though they aren't stable yet.

  • rust

    Empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.

  • WorkOS

    The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.

  • nng-rs

    It seems to me like all of the arguments against having options in Rustfmt make two assumptions: all projects will always use Rustfmt and all projects are publicly visible. The vast majority of the Rust code I write is either closed source or for my personal use, so there isn't any need for me to fit what "the community" expects. And if Rustmt doesn't allow me to style my code the way I want, I just won't use it, which means I'm back to manually enforcing the style.

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a more popular project.

Suggest a related project

Related posts