Has the Rust Grammar Working Group abandoned the canonization of the Rust grammar?

• wg-grammar

  1 98 10.0 Rust

  Where the work of WG-grammar, aiming to provide a canonical grammar for Rust, resides

  

The repo https://github.com/rust-lang/wg-grammar has not been updated since 2019, so I'm wondering if the project is still active

• reference

  22 1,133 8.7 Rust

  The Rust Reference (by rust-lang)

  

There is no normative document. However, the Rust Reference is a best-effort attempt to describe Rust, and any feature's page will contain the syntax rules for that feature (e.g. https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/comments.html ), and if the grammar on any such page is wrong it would be considered a bug and corrections can be submitted to https://github.com/rust-lang/reference .

• WorkOS

  workos.com sponsored

  The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.

  

• mrustc

  75 2,083 9.0 C++

  Alternative rust compiler (re-implementation)

The "bnf" folder in the mrustc has a more practical attempt at a working grammar: https://github.com/thepowersgang/mrustc/tree/master/bnf

Suggest a related project