Moving and re-exporting a Rust type can be a major breaking change

This page summarizes the projects mentioned and recommended in the original post on

Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Access the most powerful time series database as a service
  • SonarQube - Static code analysis for 29 languages.
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
  • rust

    Empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.

    By following this issue to this issue comment, I think the reason is the sheer complexity of tuple struct constructor: * The syntax of tuple struct constructor is the same as either a function call or a constant, so to make life easier, the rust devs made it a function or a constant, i.e. declaring a tuple struct with pub fields also fills the value namespace with a function or constant. * Named field struct constructor is cannot be mistaken for a function call, so rust devs are free to let user construct them with type aliases.

  • InfluxDB

    Access the most powerful time series database as a service. Ingest, store, & analyze all types of time series data in a fully-managed, purpose-built database. Keep data forever with low-cost storage and superior data compression.

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a more popular project.

Suggest a related project

Related posts