Zappa VS Angular

If people aren't familiar, there's a similar project for Python that's fantastic: https://github.com/zappa/Zappa

Chalice was a consequence, a reaction from AWS to the release of (Zappa Framework)[https://github.com/zappa/Zappa] that provide a very good alternative to migrate very quickly a Django/Flask or any WSGI compliant solution in Python.

Use Zappa https://github.com/zappa/Zappa and host as a Lambda, simple setup and deployment, Lambda only costs when processing requests, no servers to mess around with

One of my favorite options that is probably the most cost-effective is to deploy using a 'severless' model on AWS Lambda using zappa which supports deploying Python webapps to AWS in this way. Zappa also makes it super easy to deploy in just a couple commands! The README includes instructions for everything you might need, including handling sensitive information like your database passwords, running django management commands, setting up DNS, etc.

Deployment works nicely with Docker. I often use AWS AppRunner because it's really easy and just scales. Some people use AWS Lambda with Zappa but I don't recommend it unless you really want to spend less than $15 a month. You will probably need Django Storages to save uploads to an S3 bucket. At some stage you might want to put a CloudFront distribution in front of everything but the configuration of the caching behaviour might be a bit confusing when you do it the first time.

It doesn't have to be an either-or! I have several apps in production that were developed on Django or Flask, and deployed to Lambda using Zappa.

If you need a relational DB, you can use AWS Aurora or RDS and use cloud functions ('lambda' in AWS) that you can invoke with HTTP to process the document first. Zappa will do a lot of the configuration for you if you go that route.

Lambda + API gateway, this library bundles a Django application into a lambda https://github.com/zappa/Zappa . 1 million free invokes from aws, scale to zero, plugs into your RDS

I use Zappa, it just schedules a frequent execution of the lambda: https://github.com/zappa/Zappa#keeping-the-server-warm

/** * https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/75a186e321cb417685b2f13e9961906fc0aed36c/packages/core/src/render3/reactivity/untracked.ts#L15 * * packages/core/src/render3/reactivity/untracked.ts * **/ export function untracked(nonReactiveReadsFn: () => T): T { const prevConsumer = setActiveConsumer(null); try { return nonReactiveReadsFn(); } finally { setActiveConsumer(prevConsumer); } }

source: https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/46542

Besides the dangers, mentioned by Angular docs (infinite loops, change detection errors), there is another thing, that might be quite nasty: effects are executed in a reactive context, and any code you call in effect, will be executed in a reactive context. If that code reads some signals, they will be added as dependencies to your effect. Here Alex Rickabaugh explains the details.

In June 2023, the Angular team raised a new RFC to implement control flow syntaxes within Angular. They gave the following rationale for introducing control flow syntax:

For scheduling, I use awesome code I found in the Angular source code.

Just to give you more context, I led the migration of several AngularJS applications to the newer Angular Framework. My client finally decided to make that move following the AngularJS deprecation announcement (stay up to date please 🙏)️.

Link — angular/CONTRIBUTING.md

Angular v17 was released some months ago with a ton of new features, a brand new logo and the new blog angular.dev.