xpra
uBlock
xpra | uBlock | |
---|---|---|
50 | 2,992 | |
1,410 | 43,126 | |
5.5% | - | |
9.9 | 9.9 | |
about 11 hours ago | 15 days ago | |
Python | JavaScript | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
xpra
-
Why is remote desktop slow when host monitor is off unless HDMI cable is used?
FWIW I had decent success with Xpra on Linux, and it's still being actively developed, e.g. the HTML5 client is considered stable now: https://github.com/Xpra-org/xpra/
-
Apache Guacamole: a clientless remote desktop gateway
I use xpra for similar purposes (https://github.com/Xpra-org/xpra/)
> Xpra is known as "screen for X" : its seamless mode allows you to run X11 programs, usually on a remote host, direct their display to your local machine, and then to disconnect from these programs and reconnect from the same or another machine(s), without losing any state. Effectively giving you remote access to individual graphical applications. It can also be used to access existing desktop sessions and start remote desktop sessions.
-
Firefox 121 defaults to Wayland on Linux
I want to move to the "future", but I use several firefox profiles via xpra in combination with xdotool based hotkeys. The fluidity with which I can control my different profile windows without a mouse and with which I can switch between computers with no lag with this setup is a big reason why I have stuck with a Linux desktop, so I am sad to see those super powers go away for no perceived benefit. I have tried Wayland several times now and don't notice any performance differences, just more bugs in Wayland.
`xdotool search` seems like it has been deemed a security issue for reasons I can't understand (if someone has hacked in to the point that they can even run such query commands, surely I'm already pwn'd). Maybe I'm oversimplifying it, but to me it's like being upset that someone who broke into your house can see the color of your curtains. The powerful feature set of X far outweighs these minor security concerns.
And it looks like xpra is facing huge issues switching over https://github.com/Xpra-org/xpra/issues/387 :(, I have yet to be as satisfied with any other free remote desktop software (paid nomachine is close but less scriptable).
I hope these aren't fundamental limitations of wayland, but the challenges seem steep.
-
Advice on getting a 16GB Nvidia card..
They all operate(d) their GPUs just fine. I'm a heavy user of VirtualGL + XPRA for remote graphics usage, which is a constant factor in my life and work. When they're not doing graphics of some sort, they're hunting pulsars in a GPU-centric compute mode.
-
FreeRDP: A Remote Desktop Protocol Implementation
I've long been a huge fan of Xpra https://github.com/Xpra-org/xpra , both because of its "screen for X" original focus (though now it supports shadowing an existing session).
There was NoMachine / nx / freenx but it always seemed to be a weird animal to me, requiring installation as a separate unix user, at least at the time.
-
Cool but Obscure X11 Apps
One of my favorite bits of software is Xpra [0], "screen for X". You'd run it and it would start another X server (start apps in it with `DISPLAY=:1 xterm` or whatever), and you would "attach" it to your running X server with `xpra attach`.
You can attach to e.g. `ssh://hostname/:1`, so I ran a firefox instance on a homelab server and attached to it from my laptop and my desktop to not have to bother keeping bookmarks, tabs etc in sync.
[0] https://xpra.org/
-
Alternatives To X2go?
I’ve used Xpra in the past to connect to a remote system for GUI stuff, but I almost exclusively use ssh because most of the time I don’t need to run a remote windowing system.
-
I want to (securely) remotely access my Pop!_OS desktop from my Pop!_OS laptop - what’s the best way to do this in 2023?
To add to this if you need to access graphical applications of an entire desktop environment you can use Xpra or MOONLIGHT (I suggest the second one if you want to game on the remote desktop or need very low latency in general), you can use both of these through a ssh tunnel (you need to enable this and X forwarding in the config) so if you setup and allow access to ssh correctly you can also use these without too much of a hassle.
-
plasma-nm, libqca-qt5-2 and libkf5wallet-bin - but not in this order!
Linux fernando-ipmh61r3 6.1.0-1006-oem #6-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Tue Jan 24 18:24:09 UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux | NVIDIA-SMI 525.89.02 Driver Version: 525.89.02 CUDA Version: 12.0 | /etc/apt/sources.list:deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ jammy main universe restricted multiverse /etc/apt/sources.list:deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ jammy-updates main universe restricted multiverse /etc/apt/sources.list:deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ jammy-backports main universe restricted multiverse /etc/apt/sources.list:deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ jammy-security main universe restricted multiverse /etc/apt/sources.list.d/brave-browser-release.list:deb [arch=amd64] https://brave-browser-apt-release.s3.brave.com/ stable main /etc/apt/sources.list.d/cappelikan-ubuntu-ppa-jammy.list:deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/cappelikan/ppa/ubuntu/ jammy main /etc/apt/sources.list.d/librewolf.sources:Types: deb /etc/apt/sources.list.d/librewolf.sources:URIs: https://deb.librewolf.net /etc/apt/sources.list.d/librewolf.sources:Suites: jammy /etc/apt/sources.list.d/librewolf.sources:Components: main /etc/apt/sources.list.d/librewolf.sources:Architectures: amd64 /etc/apt/sources.list.d/librewolf.sources:Signed-By: /usr/share/keyrings/librewolf.gpg /etc/apt/sources.list.d/neon.list:deb http://archive.neon.kde.org/user/ jammy main /etc/apt/sources.list.d/nicotine-team-ubuntu-stable-jammy.list:deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/nicotine-team/stable/ubuntu/ jammy main /etc/apt/sources.list.d/obsproject-ubuntu-obs-studio-jammy.list:deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/obsproject/obs-studio/ubuntu/ jammy main /etc/apt/sources.list.d/openjdk-r-ubuntu-ppa-jammy.list:deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/openjdk-r/ppa/ubuntu/ jammy main /etc/apt/sources.list.d/org.kde.neon.net.launchpad.ppa.mozillateam.list:deb https://ppa.launchpadcontent.net/mozillateam/ppa/ubuntu/ jammy main /etc/apt/sources.list.d/winehq-jammy.sources:Types: deb /etc/apt/sources.list.d/winehq-jammy.sources:URIs: https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/ubuntu /etc/apt/sources.list.d/winehq-jammy.sources:Suites: jammy /etc/apt/sources.list.d/winehq-jammy.sources:Components: main /etc/apt/sources.list.d/winehq-jammy.sources:Architectures: amd64 i386 /etc/apt/sources.list.d/winehq-jammy.sources:Signed-By: /etc/apt/keyrings/winehq-archive.key /etc/apt/sources.list.d/xpra.sources:Types: deb /etc/apt/sources.list.d/xpra.sources:URIs: https://xpra.org /etc/apt/sources.list.d/xpra.sources:Suites: jammy /etc/apt/sources.list.d/xpra.sources:Components: main /etc/apt/sources.list.d/xpra.sources:Signed-By: /usr/share/keyrings/xpra.asc
- Looking for an application that allows VNC sharing in windows for a single application
uBlock
- Apr 24th is JavaScript Naked Day – Browse the web without JavaScript
- Mobile Ad Blocker Will No Longer Stop YouTube's Ads
-
Some notes on Firefox's media autoplay settings in practice as of Firefox 124
Check out uBlock Origin's per site switches [1]
[1]: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Per-site-switches#no-...
-
Brave's AI assistant now integrates with PDFs and Google Drive
If ads, in particular on YouTube, are the problem, anything Chromium-based is probably only going to get worse and worse (see [1] and [2]). So that basically leaves you with Firefox and Safari.
I work for Mozilla (speaking for myself, of course), so I'll leave you to guess which I'd recommend :P
[1] https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b...
[2] https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/09/googles-widely-oppos...
-
X.org Server Clears Out Remnants for Supporting Old Compilers
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock
Or if on mobile, it is well worth it to look up adblock options for the browser you use.
-
Mozilla thinks Apple, Google, Microsoft should play fair
What are the compelling advantages of Chrome nowadays?
Chrome is working to limit the capabilities of ad blockers:
https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/news/2023/11/chrome-pushes...
Whereas a compelling advantage of Firefox is that uBlock Origin works best in Firefox:
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b...
Advertising networks have often been vectors for malware. Using an ad blocker is an important security measure. Even the FBI recommends ad blockers:
https://www.malwarebytes.com/malvertising
https://theconversation.com/spyware-can-infect-your-phone-or...
https://www.ic3.gov/Media/Y2022/PSA221221?=8324278624
-
Brave Leo now uses Mixtral 8x7B as default
> It allows for 30,000 dynamic rules
That is not what we mean by dynamic filters. From https://developer.chrome.com/blog/improvements-to-content-fi...
> However, to support more frequent updates and user-defined rules, extensions can add rules dynamically too, without their developers having to upload a new version of the extension to the Chrome Web Store.
What Chrome is talking about is the ability to specify rules at runtime. What critics of Manifest V3 are talking about is not the ability to dynamically add rules (although that can be an issue), it is the ability to add dynamic rules -- ie rules that analyze and rewrite requests in the style of the blockingWebRequest permission.
It's a little deceptive to claim that the concerns here are outdated and to point to vague terminology that sounds like it's correcting the problem, but on actual inspection turns out to be entirely separate functionality from what the GP was talking about.
> Giving this ability to extensions can slow down the browser for the user. These ads can still be blocked through other means.
This is the debate; most of the adblocking community disagrees with this assertion. uBO maintains a list of some common features that are already not possible to support in Chrome ( https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b... ) and has written about features that are not able to be supported via Chrome's current V3 API ( https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/wiki/Frequently-as... ). Of particular note are filtering for large media elements (I use this a lot on mobile Firefox, it's great for reducing page size), and top-level filtering of domains/fonts.
- uBlock Origin – 1.55.0
-
In 2024, please switch to Firefox
> "Its happened before"
> That's not an argument
It's a subheading to "2. Browser engine monopoly". The subsection's purpose is describing how bad things were during the IE monopoly to reinforce that it's something to be avoided.
> in fact you could counter-argue that IE left a lot of technical debt
That would be agreeing with the article, unless I understand what you mean.
> On top of that, the internet was very different back then.
In a way that now makes it harder for truly new competing engines to pop up due to increased complexity of the web.
> I'm still not convinced, why would I change my browser?
The points made in the article are:
* Increased privacy, opposed to willingly giving your data to an ad-tech company
* Helps avoid a browser engine monopoly which would effectively let Google dictate web standards
* It’s fast and has a nice user interface
Onto which I'd add:
* Content blockers work best on Firefox (https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b...), doubly so when Manifest V3 rolls out
* Allows more customization of interface and home page
* UX improvements, like the clutter-free reader mode, aren't vetoed to protect search revenue as with Chrome (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37675467)
-
Ask HN: Is Firefox team too small to do serious security tests?
Advertising networks are vectors for malware:
https://www.cisecurity.org/insights/blog/malvertising
https://www.malwarebytes.com/malvertising
https://theconversation.com/spyware-can-infect-your-phone-or...
So if you're concerned about security then you want the browser with the best ad blocker.
uBlock Origin works best in Firefox:
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b...
What are some alternatives?
xrdp - xrdp: an open source RDP server
VideoAdBlockForTwitch - Blocks Ads on Twitch.tv.
rustdesk - An open-source remote desktop, and alternative to TeamViewer.
Spotify-Ad-Blocker - EZBlocker - A Spotify Ad Blocker for Windows
ssh-rdp - Real display ssh based remote desktop
bypass-paywalls-chrome - Bypass Paywalls web browser extension for Chrome and Firefox.
FreeRDP - FreeRDP is a free remote desktop protocol library and clients
duckduckgo-privacy-extension - DuckDuckGo Privacy Essentials browser extension for Firefox, Chrome.
Sunshine - Sunshine is a Gamestream host for Moonlight. [Moved to: https://github.com/LizardByte/Sunshine]
ClearUrls
mRemoteNG - mRemoteNG is the next generation of mRemote, open source, tabbed, multi-protocol, remote connections manager.
AdNauseam - AdNauseam: Fight back against advertising surveillance