xmrig-proxy VS p2pool

You'd want to run an OS+XMRig from removable storage + ram then point them to a xmrig-proxy.

Anyway you might want to use xmrig-proxy instead of writing your own proxy.

You could type workers in your P2Pool if you used CLI. For API you'd probably want to use xmrig proxy.

My point about p2pool as a proxy was that with monero mining what's usually talked about when people say "proxy" is xmrig-proxy.

I guess I would like more context, if you have multiple rigs and are hoping to connect them you could use something like xmrig-proxy to connect your rigs together. But if you are hoping to create your own pool for the public which isn't was is stated I believe you could just fork p2pool and go from there.

Take a look add this.

Wirh the webpage i mean https://xmrig.com/proxy

hey, sorry I missed this-- there are a couple of approaches that would work, each with it's own pros and cons depending on how comfortable you are with the command line. Check out xmrig-proxy if you haven't. Cheers.

try https://xmrig.com/proxy

https://github.com/SChernykh/p2pool says "yes" - if you’re mining from a computer behind a router (I’m not)

poolboy is a tiny (~ 200 lines of code) web server that renders a static page with stats from P2Pool data-api.

The new version (3.5) is out: https://github.com/SChernykh/p2pool

I have set up my node (pruned) as per the P2Pool recommendation: https://github.com/SChernykh/p2pool/releases

https://github.com/SChernykh/p2pool and followed the GNU/Linux guide, which is what I'm doing right now; it's making.

Just don't misinform new Monero users: p2pool and gupax are not a mining pool (that is by definition a web service maintained by another person) but rather a mining software that comes with a burden - its maintain costs and self-responsibility.