wttr.in VS Hacker-Typer

#!/bin/bash # Get weather information for a specified location LOCATION="London" curl "http://wttr.in/$LOCATION?format=3"

We’re going to use a free weather API, wttr.in, which gives us weather info just by calling a URL.

locals { url = format("https://wttr.in/%v?%v&format=%v&lang=%v&u=%v", urlencode(var.location), urlencode(var.options), urlencode(var.format), urlencode(var.lang), urlencode(var.units), ) } data "http" "weather" { url = local.url request_headers = { User-Agent = "curl" } } # Now write this to a file (as an example of a resource) resource "local_file" "cache" { filename = "cache.${var.stage}.txt" content = data.http.weather.response_body }

wttr.in is unfortunately not accurate in many cities in the world, check their github issues

The difference with weafetch is that it has its own config file which can just be configured and not touched anymore. When using wttr.in with curl, any custom changes you want to get from the output will need to be typed in everytime.

What about https://wttr.in/ ?

Hacker Typer is pure fun! It simulates typing like a Hollywood hacker. Use it to entertain your colleagues during presentations or meetings.

that - not in the same way - reminds me of a similar pair of web pages:

https://hackertyper.net - nice

https://hackertyper.com - sociopathic corruption of ad links

Because users can be extremely dumb. Ive had friends that work in tech centers open up hackertyper (after doing analysis and finding nothing) in front of their nose to "hack the hackers back" because the users kept thinking their PC was being hacked