wttr.in VS TypeScript-Website

#!/bin/bash # Get weather information for a specified location LOCATION="London" curl "http://wttr.in/$LOCATION?format=3"

We’re going to use a free weather API, wttr.in, which gives us weather info just by calling a URL.

locals { url = format("https://wttr.in/%v?%v&format=%v&lang=%v&u=%v", urlencode(var.location), urlencode(var.options), urlencode(var.format), urlencode(var.lang), urlencode(var.units), ) } data "http" "weather" { url = local.url request_headers = { User-Agent = "curl" } } # Now write this to a file (as an example of a resource) resource "local_file" "cache" { filename = "cache.${var.stage}.txt" content = data.http.weather.response_body }

wttr.in is unfortunately not accurate in many cities in the world, check their github issues

The difference with weafetch is that it has its own config file which can just be configured and not touched anymore. When using wttr.in with curl, any custom changes you want to get from the output will need to be typed in everytime.

What about https://wttr.in/ ?

To be honest, I think it is true. They declared "issue bankruptcy" in one of they repo:

https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript-Website/issues/2804

Contrary to many people's perception, Microsoft is one of the biggest contributors to open source, whether for projects they "own" like TypeScript or VSCode, or other common projects like Linux. The amount of users and bugs/feature requests etc don't match headcounts available at Microsoft.

For new components, it does make sense to follow the style defined in the React documentation by writing components using a function definition. However, arrow functions using React.FC also remain a popular choice and are used by Vercel and the official TypeScript website

I opened a pull request to remove that, because you're right, there's no way somebody can read the whole handbook in 30 minutes!

Yep, this is my answer too - I use this pattern pretty often. For example, here's the main object that represents the TypeScript Playground at runtime: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript-website/blob/86901a0520855050b16b0c23bd6923212fdd0c9c/packages/playground/src/index.ts#L622-L623

In this series of articles, I intend to provide a detailed, accurate, and step-by-step explanation of how to implement a RESTful web interface using a stack of Typescript, Node.js, Dynamoose, DynamoDB, Jest, Serverless Framework, AWS, and Amazon Cognito.

Install TypeScript package: npm i -D typescript

Beyond testing your code, it's an excellent idea to write your library in TypeScript. Type errors are among the most common type of mistake in JavaScript, so using TypeScript will almost always reduce development time and may occasionally prevent you from publishing broken code if you forget to add a test. Moreover, the excellent TypeScript compiler will allow you to avoid using a bundler when publishing your package (we'll get into this more later) and will make supporting TypeScript and JavaScript users simultaneously much easier.