wg-netns VS k3s

Compare wg-netns vs k3s and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
wg-netns k3s
2 291
113 26,405
- 1.7%
5.1 9.6
16 days ago 5 days ago
Python Go
MIT License Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

wg-netns

Posts with mentions or reviews of wg-netns. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-10-25.
  • Creating a kill switch for Wireguard using UFW
    1 project | /r/WireGuard | 16 Apr 2023
    Why use firewall rules when you can use network namespaces? If you use wg-quick you'll probably feel right at home with https://github.com/dadevel/wg-netns
  • Nine Raspberry Pis power this entire office
    7 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 25 Oct 2021
    I like wg-netns. It allows setup of a wireguard tunnel, similar to wg-quick does, in a Linux network namespace. So I can run some processes using the VPN, and others without.

    By specifying the namespace in a systemd service file, I can let a service use a specific VPN.

    https://github.com/dadevel/wg-netns

k3s

Posts with mentions or reviews of k3s. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-04-14.