websurfx VS ruff

GitHub release: https://github.com/neon-mmd/websurfx/releases/tag/v1.0.0

Sorry for being late to reach you out. Thanks for trying out Websurfx, but I can help you out in setting up Websurfx. Just a raise an issue here, or you can ask for help here at our discord, we would be glad in helping you out :).

Recently we decided to do error-handling and provide custom error-messages for the errors related to each engine code present under src/engines folder in one of my project websurfx when using error-stack and we wanted to use enums for it and we found that the error-stack project provides no guide, tutorial or example but thanks to one of our maintainers @xffxff, @xffxff provided a really cool solution to this problem and which helped me learn a lot so I decided to share with you all on what I learned from it in this post and how you can wrap errors with enums when using error-stack so stick till the end of the post.

Also, you can check out the docs for steps on how to do docker deployment. I have covered it over there in great depth.

git clone https://github.com/neon-mmd/websurfx.git

Before you look into the code, I would like to explain in brief what the code below does. The code below a function which builds a new random user-agent from the provided browsers and returns it as a string but it is too slow it takes 10 seconds to build and even with caching option enabled it takes around 5-7 seconds but I want to reduce the time it takes by as much as possible. Please provide me with some suggestions or code on how to improve this down in the comments or here in this issue I have opened in my project.

If you'd like to join the WebSurfx team and help shape the future of a privacy-centric search engine, please check out our project on GitHub: WebSurfx GitHub. Feel free to explore the code, open issues, or submit pull requests. Don't hesitate to introduce yourself and share your ideas!

Ruff is an open-source Python linter created by Astral Sh that stands out for its impressive speed, adaptability, and wide-ranging features.

Leverage Python Tools: Tapyr takes advantage of Python’s ecosystem tools, including ruff, pytest, and others.

I think I mention this all the time when this comes up, but I learned the most 'best practices' through using ruff.

https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/

I just installed and enabled all the rules by setting

Ruff is a Python linter that helps to identify and remove code smells. Over 700 built-in rules: Ruff includes native re-implementations of popular Flake8 plugins, like flake8-bugbear. And also built-in caching to avoid re-analyzing unchanged files.

Because the Python's "ast" modules is too slow, and lacks proper "format" feature (it has unparse but it removes comments, and forgets the current style completely). I use "ruff" a lot (https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff) which is in Rust. But I want to be able to implement fast custom linters in Go (linters that ruff / fixit lack, and Python linters lack or are too slow).

I think it’s interesting that rye uses ruff (https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff) for linting and formatting. That’s the right call, and it’s also correct to bundle that in for an integrated dev experience.

I had to guess, that’s the path that the Astral team would take as well - expand ruff’s capabilities so it can do everything a Python developer needs. So the vision that Armin is describing here might be achieved by ruff eventually. They’d have an advantage that they’re not a single person maintenance team, but the disadvantage of needing to show a return to their investors.

Adding more weight to ease of setup and configurability, the choice came down on flake8. It is easy to integrate, since its also available through pip and let’s you configure which standards you want to omit by simply stating them as a list via the --ignore switch. Moving to ruff appears quite smooth, so future updates may do so.

I confess I stole the pip recipe from Charlie :D

https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/blob/main/.github/workflow...