web-frameworks
Nim
Our great sponsors
web-frameworks | Nim | |
---|---|---|
26 | 347 | |
6,897 | 16,079 | |
0.5% | 0.8% | |
9.8 | 9.9 | |
6 days ago | about 5 hours ago | |
PHP | Nim | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
web-frameworks
-
[Web Frameworks Benchmark] How is the FOMO framework handling 45k+ requests more than Swoole the framework it depends on?
Notably it seems that Fomo is using the raw Swoole Server (https://github.com/fomo-framework/framework/blob/a52b75abbd06c0aa6cb1ec47c4011557bc347532/src/Servers/Http.php#L21) rather than the HTTP-specific server wrapper which is what is used in the Swoole benchmark: https://github.com/the-benchmarker/web-frameworks/blob/master/php/swoole/start.php
-
Understanding web stack performance
As an Experienced Developer (TM), I'd like to authoritatively know whether a given tech stack is "slow" or "fast", measured in requests per seconds. I'd like to find a way to correctly and objectively measure performance, but most performance suites measure a small thing in isolation. For example, The Benchmarker measures the performance of HTTP APIs, but the requests are super simple (GET request that gets a value, POST request that doesn't do anything but return a value, empty GET).
- Go with Chi has more ram consumption and less req/s than Koa or Fastify
- tools to stress test your website
- Which is the fastest web framework?
- Slower than Go, Java and JS?
-
The NanoMux HTTP router benchmark results
Hi friends. I've opened pull requests for the-benchmarker/web-frameworks and Go HTTP Router Benchmark. Hopefully, they will be merged soon. Here are the benchmark results that I got on my laptop from Julien Schmidt's Go HTTP Router Benchmark. For comparison, I also added Chi, GorillaMux, and HttpRouter.
-
Django Ninja - Help debugging/understanding Internals
The benchmark code: https://github.com/the-benchmarker/web-frameworks
- Passenger 介紹
-
Nim Version 1.6 Released
And the httpbeast code is here: https://github.com/the-benchmarker/web-frameworks/tree/maste...
Nim
- 3 years of fulltime Rust game development, and why we're leaving Rust behind
-
Top Paying Programming Technologies 2024
22. Nim - $80,000
-
"14 Years of Go" by Rob Pike
I think the right answer to your question would be NimLang[0]. In reality, if you're seeking to use this in any enterprise context, you'd most likely want to select the subset of C++ that makes sense for you or just use C#.
[0]https://nim-lang.org/
- Odin Programming Language
-
Ask HN: Interest in a Rust-Inspired Language Compiling to JavaScript?
I don't think it's a rust-inspired language, but since it has strong typing and compiles to javascript, did you give a look at nim [0] ?
For what it takes, I find the language very expressive without the verbosity in rust that reminds me java. And it is also very flexible.
[0] : https://nim-lang.org/
-
The nim website and the downloads are insecure
I see a valid cert for https://nim-lang.org/
-
Nim
FYI, on the front page, https://nim-lang.org, in large type you have this:
> Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. It combines successful concepts from mature languages like Python, Ada and Modula.
-
Things I've learned about building CLI tools in Python
You better off with using a compiled language.
If you interested in a language that's compiled, fast, but as easy and pleasant as Python - I'd recommend you take a look at [Nim](https://nim-lang.org).
And to prove what Nim's capable of - here's a cool repo with 100+ cli apps someone wrote in Nim: [c-blake/bu](https://github.com/c-blake/bu)
-
Mojo is now available on Mac
Chapel has at least several full-time developers at Cray/HPE and (I think) the US national labs, and has had some for almost two decades. That's much more than $100k.
Chapel is also just one of many other projects broadly interested in developing new programming languages for "high performance" programming. Out of that large field, Chapel is not especially related to the specific ideas or design goals of Mojo. Much more related are things like Codon (https://exaloop.io), and the metaprogramming models in Terra (https://terralang.org), Nim (https://nim-lang.org), and Zig (https://ziglang.org).
But Chapel is great! It has a lot of good ideas, especially for distributed-memory programming, which is its historical focus. It is more related to Legion (https://legion.stanford.edu, https://regent-lang.org), parallel & distributed Fortran, ZPL, etc.
- NIR: Nim Intermediate Representation
What are some alternatives?
FrameworkBenchmarks - Source for the TechEmpower Framework Benchmarks project
zig - General-purpose programming language and toolchain for maintaining robust, optimal, and reusable software.
wrk - Modern HTTP benchmarking tool
go - The Go programming language
graphql-benchmarks - GraphQL benchmarks using the-benchmarker framework.
Odin - Odin Programming Language
PHP-CRUD-API - Single file PHP script that adds a REST API to a SQL database
rust - Empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.
Fusio - Open source API management platform
crystal - The Crystal Programming Language
ray - Debug with Ray to fix problems faster
v - Simple, fast, safe, compiled language for developing maintainable software. Compiles itself in <1s with zero library dependencies. Supports automatic C => V translation. https://vlang.io