web-frameworks
graphql-benchmarks
Our great sponsors
web-frameworks | graphql-benchmarks | |
---|---|---|
26 | 1 | |
6,897 | 55 | |
0.5% | - | |
9.8 | 0.0 | |
3 days ago | over 2 years ago | |
PHP | Ruby | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
web-frameworks
-
[Web Frameworks Benchmark] How is the FOMO framework handling 45k+ requests more than Swoole the framework it depends on?
Notably it seems that Fomo is using the raw Swoole Server (https://github.com/fomo-framework/framework/blob/a52b75abbd06c0aa6cb1ec47c4011557bc347532/src/Servers/Http.php#L21) rather than the HTTP-specific server wrapper which is what is used in the Swoole benchmark: https://github.com/the-benchmarker/web-frameworks/blob/master/php/swoole/start.php
-
Understanding web stack performance
As an Experienced Developer (TM), I'd like to authoritatively know whether a given tech stack is "slow" or "fast", measured in requests per seconds. I'd like to find a way to correctly and objectively measure performance, but most performance suites measure a small thing in isolation. For example, The Benchmarker measures the performance of HTTP APIs, but the requests are super simple (GET request that gets a value, POST request that doesn't do anything but return a value, empty GET).
- Go with Chi has more ram consumption and less req/s than Koa or Fastify
- tools to stress test your website
- Which is the fastest web framework?
- Slower than Go, Java and JS?
-
The NanoMux HTTP router benchmark results
Hi friends. I've opened pull requests for the-benchmarker/web-frameworks and Go HTTP Router Benchmark. Hopefully, they will be merged soon. Here are the benchmark results that I got on my laptop from Julien Schmidt's Go HTTP Router Benchmark. For comparison, I also added Chi, GorillaMux, and HttpRouter.
-
Django Ninja - Help debugging/understanding Internals
The benchmark code: https://github.com/the-benchmarker/web-frameworks
- Passenger 介紹
-
Nim Version 1.6 Released
And the httpbeast code is here: https://github.com/the-benchmarker/web-frameworks/tree/maste...
graphql-benchmarks
-
How to build a solid Go Graphql application quickly.
I have not tried gqlgen yet. Just by comparing benchmarks at https://github.com/the-benchmarker/graphql-benchmarks/blob/develop/rates.md it looks like GGql is faster by comparing to graphql-go. I'd love to see gqlgen get added to those benchmarks or GGql added to the gqlgen comparisons.
What are some alternatives?
FrameworkBenchmarks - Source for the TechEmpower Framework Benchmarks project
golang-graphql-benchmark - benchmark of golang GraphQL framework.
wrk - Modern HTTP benchmarking tool
graphjin - GraphJin - Build NodeJS / GO APIs in 5 minutes not weeks
PHP-CRUD-API - Single file PHP script that adds a REST API to a SQL database
Derailed Benchmarks - Go faster, off the Rails - Benchmarks for your whole Rails app
Fusio - Open source API management platform
api - Minimal, lightweight, fastest Ruby framework for HTTP APIs.
ray - Debug with Ray to fix problems faster
Gearbox - Gearbox :gear: is a web framework written in Go with a focus on high performance
prologue - Powerful and flexible web framework written in Nim
benchmark-ips - Provides iteration per second benchmarking for Ruby