warcprox VS archiveweb.page

I've looked into archiving all the pages i visit as well and warcprox[1] has been bookmarked for a while now

Hard drive storage space being so cheap in the ~$15/TB range makes this more feasible even for video archival

[1] https://github.com/internetarchive/warcprox

wget also supports WARC options if you don't need javascript etc. If you do, there's also Warcprox (https://github.com/internetarchive/warcprox), brozzler (https://github.com/internetarchive/brozzler) (which uses warcprox internally), and others.

Wow, it's really rare these days to see a tool that supports WARC.

Despite being an ISO standard [1] and the default archive format of the internet archive, and despite a handfull of lovingly crafted tools (such as webrecorder [2], warcprox etc.), it never seems to have caught on in a broader context.

Really a shame - I' deeply convinced that the ability to archive and replay requests is a technique for defending and strengthening user rights.

Links:

[1] https://www.iso.org/standard/44717.html

[2] https://github.com/webrecorder/webrecorder-desktop

[3] https://github.com/internetarchive/warcprox

However, if you prefer something open-source, you could accomplish the same thing with a tool like https://archiveweb.page/ or https://github.com/internetarchive/warcprox

I use this from time to time to archive web page for my own use

https://github.com/webrecorder/archiveweb.page

I also convert web snippets I find useful to the markdown format and store it in my Joplin notebook, so that way it lives on even if the website is gone.

There's also ArchiveWeb.page, which records in the same WARC format as archive.org

https://github.com/webrecorder/archiveweb.page