warcprox VS conifer

I've looked into archiving all the pages i visit as well and warcprox[1] has been bookmarked for a while now

Hard drive storage space being so cheap in the ~$15/TB range makes this more feasible even for video archival

[1] https://github.com/internetarchive/warcprox

wget also supports WARC options if you don't need javascript etc. If you do, there's also Warcprox (https://github.com/internetarchive/warcprox), brozzler (https://github.com/internetarchive/brozzler) (which uses warcprox internally), and others.

Wow, it's really rare these days to see a tool that supports WARC.

Despite being an ISO standard [1] and the default archive format of the internet archive, and despite a handfull of lovingly crafted tools (such as webrecorder [2], warcprox etc.), it never seems to have caught on in a broader context.

Really a shame - I' deeply convinced that the ability to archive and replay requests is a technique for defending and strengthening user rights.

Links:

[1] https://www.iso.org/standard/44717.html

[2] https://github.com/webrecorder/webrecorder-desktop

[3] https://github.com/internetarchive/warcprox

However, if you prefer something open-source, you could accomplish the same thing with a tool like https://archiveweb.page/ or https://github.com/internetarchive/warcprox

I saw Rhizome-conifer(https://github.com/Rhizome-Conifer/conifer). It look great but there is a lot of open issues on github, some from 2016, and i´m afraid if it will not keep up (it would be very sad).

I would personally recommend

https://github.com/rhizome-conifer/conifer

The intent is a webrecorder for the internet.

It records all js libraries, loads videos, and all else.

Once stored, you can review a snapshot at that point in time.

They have a service option, webrecorder.io, but this one let's you store directly locally.