wait-for-it VS gitlab

python:3.10.5-slim-buster is a Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster). Follow the Debian package link given by wait-for-it, we'll eventually find this link https://packages.debian.org/source/oldoldstable/wait-for-it, I downloaded the wait-for-it_0.0~git20160501.orig.tar.gz file and extracted wait-for-it.sh out to the project root directory where setup.py, app.py, .dockerignore, Dockerfile and docker-compose.yml are.

Using countless variations of the wait for it script (they all get ignored (yes i did chmod +x)). another candidate or using it like this

I haven’t done it, but maybe you can use something like this in an ExecStartPre on the nginx systemd service, or if that doesnt work, as a separate service that nginx’s systemd service starts after

I’ve used wait-for-it with success.

https://github.com/vishnubob/wait-for-it

When start to build docker-compose, it tried to connect db first, but it seems that db didn't become reachable yet. Even added wait-for-it doesn't work.

executes 'wait-for-it.sh' to wait on the availability of port 3306 before running 'air'--using wait-for-it.sh is just an example and this shell script has to be installed as part of the Dockerfilehttps://github.com/vishnubob/wait-for-it

Yeah dockerize seems to achieve your second suggestion, someone also suggested my wait-for-it https://github.com/vishnubob/wait-for-it which seems to be similar but a bit more popular and also used in the official documentation https://docs.docker.com/compose/startup-order/ I think I'll go this route, the first option doesn't quite match what I need as all compose aren't necessarily to be started simultaneously.

Can't you use something like this? : https://github.com/vishnubob/wait-for-it . Essentially wait until you can ping redis port and then run wsgi runserver for django. However, are you sure that you can resolve redis host on swarm? Redis starts so fast that it makes me think it might be something else.

Since the relevant code appears to be in the "ee" directory <https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/v16.11.0-ee/ee/l...> and is not present in the foss repo, I'm guessing the answer is no, at least for now. They do have a history of "releasing" features from EE back to CE but my suspicion is not for LLM stuff

(Side note: Issues are usually hash-prefixed like #1234 both on GitLab and GitHub. However, commit messages must not begin with a hash, they would be considered a comment and ignored. Therefore, GitHub has introduced the alternative prefix GH- and I've contributed a similar prefix GL- to GitLab a while ago.)

and its "oh, you want multi-arch, do you?" friend. While prosecuting this <https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/339567> I learned that https://hub.docker.com/layers/multiarch/qemu-user-static/7.2... actually mutates the binfmt_misc in buildx's context in order to exec the static copy of qemu in it https://github.com/multiarch/qemu-user-static/blob/v7.2.0-1/...

and, that the buildx plugin itself has some qemu magick in it, which got addressed in a minor version bump but I couldn't track down the relevant GitHub issue this second (I've flushed it from my mind, only recalling that there were a lot of actors in that tire fire)

This is actually a follow-up refactor, the fix is here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/commit/abe79e4ec43798...