vtebench
autocomplete
vtebench | autocomplete | |
---|---|---|
5 | 164 | |
284 | 24,274 | |
0.0% | 0.1% | |
0.0 | 9.6 | |
over 1 year ago | 7 days ago | |
Rust | TypeScript | |
Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
vtebench
-
Just How Much Faster Are the Gnome 46 Terminals?
https://github.com/alacritty/vtebench/tree/master
-
Show HN: Warp, a Rust-based terminal for the modern age
Hey - that's a good point. The thing about terminal benchmarks is that there are many of them, each focusing on a different aspect and producing different results. There's one by alacritty team[1] that we used in our initial tests[2], there's another ones mentioned in the comments above etc. When using vtbench, Warp performed much better than iterm, for example.
Ideally we'd ace all of them, but we're not there yet. Anecdotally, many of our users mention speed/performance improvements over other terminal apps a lot in our Discord!
[1] https://github.com/alacritty/vtebench
-
How Warp Works
The diagram below shows the output of vtebench for scrolling in various terminals. For some reason Hyper generally could not handle running the benchmarks at all and did not terminate after a reasonable amount of time.
-
Top 3 GPU-Accelerated Terminal Emulators
It's not easy to measure the performance of terminal apps. But I definitely notice a difference compared to let's say iTerm2, especially when scrolling through large files in Vim. Alacritty claims that it's faster than the competition using vtebench as a benchmarking tool. Kitty claims that the CPU usage is slightly increased compared to xterm (6-8% compared to 5-7%), but that scrolling is smoother.
- Alacritty vs Kitty
autocomplete
-
Fig Is Sunsetting
Having contributed to the Fig autocomplete specs, I find this sad. The Amazon product Fig was built into basically works as replacement, which is good. Still, the core value of this product are the open-source autocomplete specs: https://github.com/withfig/autocomplete. What's going to happen to that? It looks like they are still using it in the Amazon product. It should definitely be possible for an open-source re-implementation of the Fig UI to use those specs. There is a lot of knowledge encoded in there!
-
Top Free Utility Mac Apps You Aren’t Using
8. Fig
-
Ask HN: Alternatives to fig.io as it has signups disabled?
Fig is awesome but with signups blocked[1] for 2+mo already it's also as good as dead ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
* [1]: https://github.com/withfig/autocomplete/issues/2068
-
Show HN: Inshellisense – IDE style shell autocomplete
https://github.com/withfig/autocomplete is it this?
- Fig
-
Show HN: Whiz – A copilot for your command line
How is this different than https://fig.io/?
-
Boost DX, Enhance UX, and Skyrocket Profits! Dive into a sub-50ms world with Edge Feature Flags 🚀
AWS CloudWatch Evidently The worst. No comment. AWS seems to perpetually lack a good DX for developers. It appears that they don't recognize or continually undervalue the importance of roles other than engineers, such as Product Managers or Designers. Very disappointing. However, AWS has recently acquired Fig, so looks like they're now pursuing an acquisition strategy instead. Let's see how it turns it out, and let's hope they don't ruin Fig, since it's such an useful tool.
-
Ask HN: What are some well-designed websites?
slightly tangential, but where do people get awesome landing pages like linear(https://fig.io/. has similar landing page) etc. Do they build them in-house or buy templates somewhere? Many of the recently launched YC companies have awesome landing pages. eg. https://automorphic.ai/,
-
Fig Has Joined AWS
I love this product, have contributed several times to it, and I'm a little torn. One thing I am thinking about now, is that the completion specs are MIT-licensed, and it should be possible to use them to re-implement a basic open-source version of the autocompletion product... https://github.com/withfig/autocomplete
What are some alternatives?
vte - Parser for virtual terminal emulators
ohmyzsh - 🙃 A delightful community-driven (with 2,300+ contributors) framework for managing your zsh configuration. Includes 300+ optional plugins (rails, git, macOS, hub, docker, homebrew, node, php, python, etc), 140+ themes to spice up your morning, and an auto-update tool so that makes it easy to keep up with the latest updates from the community.
Warp - Warp is a modern, Rust-based terminal with AI built in so you and your team can build great software, faster.
fzf-tab - Replace zsh's default completion selection menu with fzf!
glassbench - A micro-benchmark framework to use with cargo bench
warp - Secure and simple terminal sharing
starship - ☄🌌️ The minimal, blazing-fast, and infinitely customizable prompt for any shell!
benchmark-scratchpad - A quick scratchpad for benchmarking Rust code
hyperterm - A terminal built on web technologies
upterm - A terminal emulator for the 21st century.
zsh-autocomplete - 🤖 Real-time type-ahead completion for Zsh. Asynchronous find-as-you-type autocompletion.