vite_ruby VS turbo

With the recent release of Bun and its newfound support for Vite, coupled with Ruby on Rails 7.1 incorporating native support for Bun, developers can now enhance their web development workflow significantly. Here is the effortless process of enabling Bun for Vite Ruby, ultimately streamlining your front-end builds.

Vite, in particular, ViteRuby is a solid option. It sits between ESBuild and Webpacker, and if you're looking at Webpacker, Vite may actually be a better option for you. It is a very solid option, and I've enjoyed using Vite personally.

Yep. vite_rails (website/GitHub) is the way to go.

Use vite with https://vite-ruby.netlify.app/ if you don’t go the inertia route.

--skip-javascript is necessary for avoiding conflicts on the next steps. In case of bootstrap/foundation-sites the asset pipeline is helpful so --skip-asset-pipeline is not applied.

Vite Ruby is an umbrella project with libraries that will allow you to easily integrate Vite at your favourite Ruby framework, such as Rails or Hanami, or a plain Rack app. If you are tired of waiting for webpack to compile, this project might be for you. ​ Vite.js in Ruby ## Why Vite? 🤔 Vite does not bundle your code during development, which means the dev server is extremely fast to start, and your changes will be updated instantly thanks to HMR. This is great when adjusting styles, or tweaking behavior in JS. In production, Vite bundles your code with tree-shaking, lazy-loading, and common chunk splitting out of the box, to achieve optimal loading performance. ## Why Vite in Ruby? 🤔 Vite is great on its own, but configuring it correctly to work for a Ruby app structure requires knowledge of its internals. By following existing Rails and Rack conventions, and adding a few of its own, it becomes possible for ⠀everyone to leverage Vite and its wonderful features! If you are curious about the difference, check this Jumpstart Rails template.

Vite Rails Docs

It something that basically doesn't work properly since the birth of Rails, 15 years ago. For beginners, this is a big disappointment. You have to tweak Guard-livereload (tricky and not always working, as you mentionned), or try things like browserSync (also tricky, also not always working...) My advice so far : keep Sprockets, in order to have a nice integration with older gems. And completly remove the current js-bundling + importmaps. Instead, replace with the gem 'vite_rails' (repo here : https://github.com/ElMassimo/vite_ruby).

I also recommend checking out the docs for Stimulus and Turbo to familiarise yourself with all their features and the APIs used in this series.

https://github.com/hotwired/turbo

Turbo 8 remove typescript without using JSDOC

Experiment using Turbo to drive front-end behavior: "Turbo 7.2.0 (currently in beta) allows you to define your own Stream actions which can be any JS code you want. By combining a custom Stream action or two with web components, you can essentially drive reactive frontend behavior from the backend stupidly easily. Loooove it! 😍 […] For a turnkey example, you could check out https://github.com/hopsoft/turbo_ready " —Jared White on The Spicy Web Discord

This handles disconnection (as could be done by any destructive change to the DOM, like navigating with Turbo or htmx, I'm not even talking about using the element in a JavaScript-heavy web app) but not reconnection though, and we've exited early from the connectedCallback to avoid initializing the element twice, so this change actually broke our component in these situations where it's moved around, or stashed and then reinserted. To fix that, we need to always call addSparkles in connectedCallback, so move all the rest into an if, that's actually as simple as that… except that when the user prefers reduced motion, sparkles are never removed, so they keep piling in each time the element is connected again. One way to handle that, without introducing our housekeeping of individual timers, is to just remove all sparkles on disconnection. Either that or conditionally add them in connectedCallback if either we're initializing the element (including attaching the shadow DOM) or the user doesn't prefer reduced motion. The difference between both approaches is in whether we want the small animation when the sparkles appear (and appearing at new random locations). I went with the latter.

If you think you have seen enough Rails magic, you are mistaken my friend. Rails have a new trick up its sleeve: Hotwire. And with the magical Turbo tool that comes with it, you can create modern, interactive web applications with minimal, or sometimes no JavaScript at all, providing users with an incredibly smooth experience.

There is also Turbo and the frameworks who adopt them, Ruby on Rails, PHP Symphony and possibly others that solves the same issue in the same manner as HTMX. And the choice for HTMX is only a personal taste in this, but you should definitely learn about this, this is as cool as HTMX!

Most controversially, the Turbo framework dropped TypeScript support altogether after assessing that strong typing was the culprit behind poor developer experience.

Turbo[0] has been solving this for years. Quite the contrary, front-end frameworks have started to think "sending JSON is good, but actually sending HTML could be great!".

DHH's presentation[1] during Rails World 2023 is quite interesting in that regard, I recommend you give it a go (start around minute 16). I am actually very excited with his vision of the web.

[0] https://turbo.hotwired.dev/