verlihub VS qTox

I even baked a DC++ hub (server) into "Vojisto" which was a Linux distro a built in college specifically for LAN party routers. I hilariously just found while searching for it this presentation I did for a Sigma Xi conference. I think I used verlihub. The source for building Vojisto is long lost to time -- frankly building everything on Docker would be a lot more modern -- but I found some screenshots and whatnot, as well as the ISO. It wouldn't be much use these days, though: it was a very basic Linux 2.6 kernel with just enough stuff to be better than a WRT54G and have some basic admin panel controls for the DHCP static leases and the DC++ hub. Don't reboot or you'd use your configuration unless you exported it ;-)

If you go to https://github.com/qTox/qTox You will see the following: "Due to a lack of resources, qTox is no longer maintained. If someone with provable C++ experience and sufficient resources to maintain qTox wants to take over I'm happy to discuss that." So is someone going to "take over"? I really like qTox & would hate to see it go.

qTox https://qtox.github.io/ There is an android variant called aTox, not sure about mobile IOS.

Maybe something that uses the Tox network? Maybe qTox: https://qtox.github.io/

Qtox(p2p messaging?) failed: You can send files, but it looks like you can only open folders to look for files to send, not send folders themselves.

Tox (anonymous too, if routed through Tor) [clients like qTox might not be the "sexiest", but they are small and can be used almost anywhere]

What is Google? https://qtox.github.io/

Qtox does all that, even if screen sharing was a bit obscure years ago. Qtox won't work on iOS but there is an Android release. Big advantages: no server required, easy to use, secure, open source.