vala-www
v
vala-www | v | |
---|---|---|
34 | 219 | |
47 | 35,272 | |
- | 0.1% | |
7.4 | 9.9 | |
3 days ago | 7 days ago | |
SCSS | V | |
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
vala-www
-
Vala Programming Language
https://vala.dev/
an apps list is here
else you have :
- The Vala Programming Language
-
Odin Programming Language
Vala (compiles to C, some GTK apps are written in this) - https://vala.dev/
- Ask HN: Who is developing a programming language that compiles to C?
-
Vale's First Prototype for Immutable Region Borrowing
There's also been a language called Vala, active since 2006!
https://vala.dev
-
Off topic? Recommend a language well supported on Emacs..
The only language I can think of that fully meets these requirements is Vala. It is GNOME-centric, is available in any distro, has automatic memory management, and has bindings to a ton of open source libs.
- gtk-ks: Join the Effort to create GTK Bindings for Kotlin!
- Unusual programming language that you use (Work, Hobby)
-
Nim version 2.0.0 release candidate
> In my understanding, Nim at the moment is really a transpiled language, instead of compiled. Transpiled to C, then tooling uses clang or gcc to do compilation from C to target platforms.
If I understood correctly, like the Vala language: https://vala.dev/ (Note: Vala is strongly integrated with GObject).
v
-
V Language Review (2023)
Their site is clearly showing the language is in beta. The V documentation also states that autofree is WIP, and to use the GC instead. This isn't a corporate created language, but looks to be a true volunteer open source effort from people around the world.
Their community, in comparison to others, even has their discussions open and open threads for criticism[1]. These
[1]https://github.com/vlang/v/discussions/7610
-
Towards memory safety with ownership checks for C
V also has this https://github.com/vlang/v/blob/master/doc/docs.md#embed_fil...
- Vlang Release v0.4.4
- Vox: Upcoming open-source browser engine in V
- Building a web blog in V & SQLite
- bultin_write_buf_to_fd_should_use_c_write
- The V Machine Learning Roadmap and Ecosystem
-
Show HN: A new stdlib for Golang focusing on platform native support
Goroutines was the selling point for me until they decided to introduce telemetry in their toolchain; that was what forced me to stop using Golang as a whole.
About GC, I would say: if you implement C++'s RAII mechanism to replace garbage collection, then I believe this project will have a bright future.
My final question is the following: how `pcz` compares to V language, from a syntax's perspective [1]?
[1] https://github.com/vlang/v
- Hopefully, the V developers will establish a relationship with Microsoft.
-
The V Programming Language 0.4
V has the right to exist, have its supporters, and do things its own way. The creator and developers of V, from what I have seen, has always responded well to constructive criticism. Their language has discussions opened at their GitHub, unlike those for various other languages. They even have a thread for what people don't like and want improved about the language[1], again, something many other languages don't have.
A lot of what was going on initially, was coming from obvious competitors, to include being uncivil, inflammatory, and insulting. The initial "criticism" was not so much that, but false accusations of the language being a scam, vaporware, fraud, or didn't really exist. To include attacks and jealousy about its funding and having supporters. This was not any kind of "valid" criticism, that the creator or contributors of the language could reason about.
The "criticism" never died down, but rather after V was open-sourced and established itself on GitHub. The initial series of false accusations could not stand nor could the support it was getting be stopped. So, the rhetoric and targets shifted to whatever could be found to go after on the newly released alpha version of the language and its new website. In that new mix of what was being thrown at it, there were indeed some very valid criticisms, as can be found with any new language.
Constructive and valid criticism, is not the same as insults, trolling, misinformation, rivalry, or false accusations. There is clearly a difference. It's disingenuous to pretend something from one group is the same as the other, or that the intent behind what is being done is not different.
[1] https://github.com/vlang/v/discussions/7610
What are some alternatives?
mqtt.org - The mqtt.org website
zig - General-purpose programming language and toolchain for maintaining robust, optimal, and reusable software.
website - Flutter documentation web site
go - The Go programming language
crystal-website - crystal-lang.org website
Odin - Odin Programming Language
carbon-lang - Carbon Language's main repository: documents, design, implementation, and related tools. (NOTE: Carbon Language is experimental; see README)
Nim - Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. It combines successful concepts from mature languages like Python, Ada and Modula. Its design focuses on efficiency, expressiveness, and elegance (in that order of priority).
go-is-not-good - A curated list of articles complaining that go (golang) isn't good enough
sokol - minimal cross-platform standalone C headers
Tango-D2 - A port of the Tango library to D2
hn-search - Hacker News Search