uix
reactjs.org
uix | reactjs.org | |
---|---|---|
1 | 69 | |
428 | 9,124 | |
- | - | |
0.0 | 9.8 | |
8 months ago | about 1 year ago | |
HTML | TypeScript | |
Eclipse Public License 2.0 | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
uix
-
React.dev
> But Reagent supports functional components as well, with hooks and all.
I addressed this already: while reagent is able to emit function components, there is a performance penalty to this.[1]
> I also very much like Hiccup, and so do many of us, because code is data and data is code, and Helix has decided not to support that.
Hiccup is convenient to write, but it is a constant run-time cost and a significant storage cost given that you have to store long series of constructors to cljs.core.PersistentVector in your bundle, have the JS runtime actually construct the vector, then pass it through a Hiccup interpreter to finally produce DOM nodes and throw away the persistent vector, only to repeat this entire process again on re-render.[2]
> Helix has decided not to support that.
That is simply not true. From the Helix documentation[2],
> If you want to use libraries like sablono, hicada or even hx hiccup parser, you can easily add that by creating a custom macro.
These are all Hiccup interpreters you can readily use.
IME there is very little difference between using the $ macro in Helix and writing Hiccup. I do not really miss Hiccup when I use Helix, and you still have data as code ;)
While this is from an unrelated project, there are benchmarks[3] done against Reagent that demonstrate the sheer overhead it has. In practice it is not a big problem if you rarely trigger a re-render, but otherwise it is a non-trivial cost, and if you want to use modern React features (like Suspense), there is a lot of r/as-element mingling going on, converting cases, etc. that simply make Reagent feel more tedious to use than Helix.
Also, the newer UIx2, which largely borrows from Helix, is "3.2x faster than Reagent" according to one of the contributors.[4]
I think it'd be worthwhile to benchmark all of these libraries against each other and record the data in one place. Maybe I'll get around to doing it this weekend :)
---
[1] https://github.com/reagent-project/reagent/blob/master/doc/R...
[2] https://github.com/lilactown/helix/blob/master/docs/faq.md#w...
[3] https://github.com/roman01la/uix#benchmarks
[4] https://github.com/pitch-io/uix/pull/12
reactjs.org
-
New React docs pretend SPAs don't exist anymore
yes, he advocated for Vite in his pr: https://github.com/reactjs/reactjs.org/pull/5487
-
Everything You Need to Know About the Updated React Docs
There have been several calls recently to remove the CRA recommendation, perhaps most notably from popular Twitter use and YouTuber Theo (t3.gg) whose pull request on the reactjs project recommending the replacement of CRA with Vite went viral on Twitter. This sparked heated criticism of CRA, including its perceived lack of features (such as native support for TypeScript or popular CSS library Tailwind), size, performance, and more.
-
Introducing react.dev: the new React docs site!
It’s built on Next with tailwind. Check out the beta directory here: https://github.com/reactjs/reactjs.org
-
React.dev
Not Docusaurus, but the source is here:
https://github.com/reactjs/reactjs.org (currently in the "beta" directory)
-
Setup React and Tailwind - The Easy Way
This came up a couple of weeks ago due to a PR opened on the CRA repo asking to kinda deprecate it as the main choice for new React projects. I couldn't help but share my opinion on this as well:
- Proposal to replace create-react-app
- Replace Create React App Recommendation with Vite by T3dotgg · Pull Request
-
Dan Abramov's Response on History and Future of CRA
https://github.com/reactjs/reactjs.org/pull/5487#issuecommen...
I remember submitting the full link. Dunno why it was edited
-
Dan Abramov discusses create-react-app's future
More specifically, the comment: https://github.com/reactjs/reactjs.org/pull/5487#issuecommen...
- Dan Abramov: extensive response on the history and future of Create React App
What are some alternatives?
helix - A simple, easy to use library for React development in ClojureScript.
react - Cheatsheets for experienced React developers getting started with TypeScript
racing-game-cljs - A 3D racing game built with ClojureScript, React and ThreeJS
rabbitmq-website - RabbitMQ website
instantsearch - ⚡️ Libraries for building performant and instant search experiences with Algolia. Compatible with JavaScript, TypeScript, React and Vue.
React - The library for web and native user interfaces.
uix - Idiomatic ClojureScript interface to modern React.js
snapcraft.io - The official website's repository for the Snap store
reagent - A minimalistic ClojureScript interface to React.js
control-flag - A system to flag anomalous source code expressions by learning typical expressions from training data
klipse - Klipse is a JavaScript plugin for embedding interactive code snippets in tech blogs.
petite-vue - 6kb subset of Vue optimized for progressive enhancement