u-service
standard
u-service | standard | |
---|---|---|
3 | 18 | |
514 | 2,596 | |
- | 0.7% | |
3.1 | 8.0 | |
6 months ago | 5 days ago | |
Ruby | Ruby | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
u-service
- Should I use service objects?
-
Utilizando o padrĂŁo interactor no Ruby on Rails
Version Documentation unreleased https://github.com/serradura/u-case/blob/main/README.md 4.5.1 https://github.com/serradura/u-case/blob/v4.x/README.md 3.1.0 https://github.com/serradura/u-case/blob/v3.x/README.md 2.6.0 https://github.com/serradura/u-case/blob/v2.x/README.md 1.1.0 https://github.com/serradura/u-case/blob/v1.x/README.md
standard
-
Am I the only one who doesn't put parentheses around the parameters in Ruby method definitions?
Rubocop has a default rule that says to put parentheses when there are parameters; even Standardrb has a default ([https://github.com/standardrb/standard/blob/8307fa8f449f896075ccad 74bf6a128ed2c26189/config/base.yml#L1098:title])
- Standardrb: Ruby's bikeshed-proof linter and formatter
-
Must-have gems for mature Rails
gem "rubocop" - https://github.com/rubocop/rubocop | Set up code guidelines for your dev team, I recommend using whatever Standard recommends.
-
A Writer's Ruby
Cynically, reading heavily between the lines, this reads to me like DHH just found out lots of rubyists like standardrb. https://github.com/standardrb/standard -- and this is his quick reaction to it.
-
"Useless Ruby sugar": Endless (one-line) methods
This is a huge reason why I still use StandardJS and—shifting back to Ruby—why I rejected the countless requests for implementing line-length or any other metrics analysis rules for [StandardRB](https://github.com/standardrb/standard). There is always a legitimate edge case when it comes to length of lines and functions and the alternative—chopping them off arbitrarily—is rarely an improvement.
-
An Introduction to RuboCop for Ruby on Rails
This approach is known as Standard Ruby. It can also be completed with plugins, including one for Ruby on Rails projects.
-
It's Official: the Standard Ruby VS Code extension
Oh, this is fantastic! Would you be willing to send a quick PR to our README?
-
Rails vs Rubocop?
[0] https://github.com/testdouble/standard
-
Linting and Auto-formatting Ruby Code With RuboCop
If you don't want to fiddle with configuration files and the wealth of options provided by RuboCop, consider taking a look at the Standard project. It's largely a pre-configured version of RuboCop that aims to enforce a consistent style in your Ruby project without allowing the customization of any of its rules. The lightning talk where it was first announced gives more details about its origin and motivations.
- Utilizando o padrĂŁo interactor no Ruby on Rails
What are some alternatives?
Rails Event Store - A Ruby implementation of an Event Store based on Active Record
Ruby style guide - A community-driven Ruby coding style guide
Interactor - Interactor provides a common interface for performing complex user interactions.
eslint-config-standard - ESLint Config for JavaScript Standard Style
Pathway - Define your business logic in simple steps
rubocop-rspec - Code style checking for RSpec files
wisper - A micro library providing Ruby objects with Publish-Subscribe capabilities
ansi-strikethrough - The color strikethrough, in ansi.
Light Service - Series of Actions with an emphasis on simplicity.
rubocop-rails - A RuboCop extension focused on enforcing Rails best practices and coding conventions.
Rectify - Build maintainable Rails apps
Hanami::Model - Ruby persistence framework with entities and repositories