tunsocks VS wireguard-vyatta-ubnt

tunsocks[0] might be of interest to you. It's very similar to the software mentioned by OP except in C. It uses the lwIP usermode tcp/ip stack. It doesn't itself have any VPN or tunneling support, but instead relies on raw packets being passed into and out of a pipe. It can then provide access to that network via various proxies, port forwards, and even raw packets via NAT (very useful for VMs).

[0]: https://github.com/russdill/tunsocks

NetBird simplifies Kubernetes access with its zero-configuration approach, leveraging WireGuard's simplicity and strength. It seamlessly integrates with various tools, offering transparency and high reliability as an open source solution.

WireGaurd

As for remote access, you will need another computer to install tailscale or wireguard vpn to access your local devices https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkKz7Vza1rw and the official docs for up to date advice https://www.wireguard.com/ this doesn't require much to run, you can use any old family computer or some old quad core 2nd-4th gen intel desktop for 30 bucks off facebook marketplace. You can also use that same computer to run klipper if you install proxmox and have two separate linux virtual machines.

Um modo mais avançado de se proteger é utilizando protocolos de VPN mais modernos, como o WireGuard. Muitos provedores de VPN oferecem suporte a este protocolo, que além de muito simples de usar e além do mais é open source.

here u find out how wireguard works https://www.wireguard.com/

WireGuard is a VPN protocol developed several years ago which is exremely fast, lightweight, and uses state-of-the art cryptography. Its performance blows legacy VPN's out of the water.

Try vanilla. It solved all my problems bar none.

WireGuard has much less code than OpenVPN meaning that it has much less opportunities for bugs/vulnerabilities — "WireGuard is extremely simple... already it might be regarded as the most secure." So no, just because you weren't aware of something or don't agree with it doesn't make it "disinformation."