evil
undo-tree | evil | |
---|---|---|
6 | 105 | |
- | 3,241 | |
- | 0.8% | |
- | 8.0 | |
- | 6 days ago | |
Emacs Lisp | ||
- | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
undo-tree
-
Text Editor Data Structures: Rethinking Undo
vundo is a simpler implementation: it reuses Emacs's tree and just implements the visualisation part.
undo-tree is a reimplementation of Emacs's tree based undo, that supports a visualization.
* undo-tree LOC: 4700. https://gitlab.com/tsc25/undo-tree/-/blob/master/undo-tree.e...
* vundo LOC: 1350. https://github.com/casouri/vundo/blob/master/vundo.el
-
How to undo the undo
That said, the situations seems murky still: the version in ELPA is newer (0.7.5), but it's still outdated, the home page advertises 0.8.2 as the latest version. And it moved to a different repository location. And looking at its history, it seems to never have included the version 0.7.5: https://gitlab.com/tsc25/undo-tree/-/commit/5da2a7aee98393d26a93c499dc79fcf793f161e1
- Undo-Tree.el
-
Why is it so hard to see code from 5 minutes ago?
Itβs easier to mentally map that the default behaviour undo/redo for Emacs (which is not unreasonable, just complex).
The source for undo-tree contains documentation which very effectively describes the way the library works with examples and comparisons with how Emacs does things by default: https://gitlab.com/tsc25/undo-tree/-/blob/master/undo-tree.e...
- undo-tree repository's new home (Gitlab)
-
undo-tree git repository is not available anymore?
Looks like the repo is moved to https://gitlab.com/tsc25/undo-tree
evil
-
From Doom to Vanilla Emacs
evil mode
-
Packages that you would like to be in emacs core ?
Since we already have vyper-mode, why not add Evil to the stack?
-
Ask HN: Does anyone Lisp without Emacs?
2 stripe blue belt here! I used to use Vim for everything other than Java development and have now adopted Emacs in the same way. I am using it for Clojure and Common Lisp development along with org mode, irc, rss, git and file management
I started with Evil mode and then moved to Xah fly keys before sticking to the emacs bindings. Having the caps lock key bound to CTRL helped me a lot. I don't know if it makes that much of a difference for Emacs but using the DVORAK layout has helped my fingers
There are other bindings you can try like Meow or God mode but I don't know what the adoption rate is like for them. Emacs gives you the flexibility to set it up as you please. As others have mentioned, there may be other keyboard options that might be more helpful as well
https://github.com/emacs-evil/evil
-
Emacs Is My New Window Manager
If you already know Vim, you should probably not use Emacs without Evil:
https://github.com/emacs-evil/evil
It gives you comprehensive Vim bindings so what you need to learn to be comfortable in Emacs is very little. As a bonus, it also keeps your RSI risk unchanged.
-
Imaginary Problems Are the Root of Bad Software
Emacs is a text ecosystem. And it's trivial to add these shortcuts. Evil[0] basically rewires everything to be Vim.
[0]: https://github.com/emacs-evil/evil
-
Is orgmode really that much better than an equivalent workflow using vim + other tools?
I would *highly* recommend using vim keybindings if you're just getting into it (Doom or just evil). I switched from vim to emacs and tried to rough it with the default keybindings thinking that otherwise I wasn't /really/ using emacs, but I was wrong! I've been using org-mode/emacs for ~2 years now and I've slowly been migrating everything into it as I find useful tools/modes/etc (and now thanks to u/ilemming I have ~12 more to experiment with π)
-
Switching from Emacs. My experience
Despite using Emacs as my main editor, I was extremely familiar with Vim since I also used it frequently, and was able to use it quite well, especially because I also used [evil](https://github.com/emacs-evil/evil) in Emacs since Emacs's native keybindings are uncomfortable to use. I never used Vim as my primary editor though because it was cumbersome to configure. As many people say, Vimscript just feels wrong, so I gave up on trying to customize Vim.
-
Is it possible to use vim like navigation and control everywhere on the windows/mac applications?
uhm... this maybe? https://github.com/emacs-evil/evil
-
Avarege traaaArch user be like
doom is a set of configuration files (to put it lightly π ) for emacs, a text editor with really really powerful configuration abilities -- your "config files" are actually code in a full-fledged programming language, so people have done things like built package managers in it, or written full emulators for other text editors
-
Cursor seems to get stuck when scrolling, need help fixing.
Does it look like this? https://github.com/emacs-evil/evil/issues/1778
What are some alternatives?
emacs-undo-fu
doom-emacs - An Emacs framework for the stubborn martian hacker [Moved to: https://github.com/doomemacs/doomemacs]
undotree - The undo history visualizer for VIM
lsp-mode - Emacs client/library for the Language Server Protocol
vim-mundo - :christmas_tree: Vim undo tree visualizer
spacemacs - A community-driven Emacs distribution - The best editor is neither Emacs nor Vim, it's Emacs *and* Vim!
emacs-undo-fu-session
Visual Studio Code - Visual Studio Code
WBO - Online collaborative Whiteboard that is simple, free, easy to use and to deploy
VSpaceCode - Spacemacs like keybindings for Visual Studio Code
xray - An experimental next-generation Electron-based text editor
portacle - A portable common lisp development environment