transferred-stepzen-schemas VS rust

Go to stepzen.com and click on the start for free button.

Either way, I'm not too familiar with RxDB but looking at the docs you can also use StepZen to create the GraphQL layer that you use for replication. With StepZen you can build and deploy a GraphQL API based on multiple datasources (including MSSQL) in minutes. That way you only have to worry about building the logic that pulls and push replicates data to and from GraphQL. How you structure the MSSQL database would become the most important part of this project, to ensure a smooth replication.

There are multiple ways to get a GraphQL API on top off a Postgres database. If you want to have a GraphQL abstraction layer that runs as a hosted service and needs almost no code, have a look at StepZen. You can build a GraphQL API for the Postgres database by following the docs here. StepZen introspects the database (using stepzen import postgresql) and let it create the schema for you based on all the tables and columns of your database. Including a set of queries to get started with.

If you’re looking for a managed service, have a look atStepZen. You can combine multiple GraphQL schemas into one cloud GraphQL API. Instead of writing a gateway yourself, you can use SDL to merge different schemas. Besides GraphQL APIs you can also “federate” other data sources like SQL or REST

There are many of them, including StepZen which is language/framework agnostic and let you create a GraphQL server with GraphQL SDL only - in a declarative way

I’ve seen more products letting you join/merge GraphQL schemas independent of schema stitching or federation. Have a look at GraphQL Mesh or StepZen.

You can save yourself the hassle of having to build a GraphQL server, resolvers and database connections with StepZen (https://stepzen.com). It’s a product that is based solely on GraphQL SDL and you set the database connections with directives. Also, you can use it to connect other APIs

There is one thing I can say for sure: I love the spirit of open source. I've had a wonderful time working with open source communities of different sizes (e.g. Seneca-CDOT, StepZen, Appwrite, and Zulip). Fortunately, all of them are fantastic and patient with beginners.

If the only thing you're trying to do is converting a REST API to GraphQL, you should have a look at https://stepzen.com/

StepZen filed an issue about writing a GraphQL schema to integrate SpaceX REST API into their React application. I found this as an excellent opportunity for me to learn GraphQL.

> There are online Rust compilers and interpreters already if you just want to rapid prototype and develop ideas in Rust

You are responding to one of the key developers of Rust early on[1], who's been working with the language for 14 years at that point.

[1] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/graphs/contributors?from=2... and he's still #16 in commits overall today, despite almost no activity on the rust compiler since 2014.

If you haven't dipped your touch-typing fingers into Rust yet, you really owe it to yourself. Rust is a modern programming language with features that make it suitable not only for systems programming -- its original purpose, but just about any other environment, too; there are frameworks that let your build web services, web applications including user interfaces, software for embedded devices, machine learning solutions, and of course, command-line tools. Since a custom GitHub Action is essentially a command-line tool that interacts with the system through files and environment variables, Rust is perfectly suited for that as well.

Here's an example of someone citing a disagreement between CRT and shell32:

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44650

This in addition to the Rust CVE mentioned elsewhere in the thread which was rooted in this issue:

https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/04/09/cve-2024-24576.html

Here are some quick programs to test contrasting approaches. I don't have examples of inputs where they parse differently on hand right now, but I know they exist. This was also a problem that was frequently discussed internally when I worked at MSFT.

    #include 

> instead of choosing a certain numbered version of the random library (if I remember correctly) I let cargo download the latest version which had a completely different API.

Yeah, they didn't follow the instructions and got burned. I still think that multiple things went wrong simultaneously for that experience. I wonder if more prevalent uses of `#[doc(alias = "name")]` being leveraged by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120730 (which now that I check only accounts for methods and not functions, I should get on that!) so that when changing APIs around people at least get a slightly better experience.

Almost fixed the compiler: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123325

Rust: A secure, efficient, and modern programming language (omitting ten thousand words). You can simply follow the installation instructions provided on the official website.

Recently did something similar in Rust but for generating SVGs. We've adopted it for snapshot testing of cargo and rustc's output. Don't have a good PR handy for showing Github's rendering of changes in the SVG (text, side-by-side, swiping) but https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121877/files has newly added SVGs.

To see what is supported, see the screenshot in the docs: https://docs.rs/anstyle-svg/latest/anstyle_svg/

We strongly believe in Rust as a powerful language for building production-grade software, especially for systems like ours that run alongside Kubernetes.