todo_or_die VS SIT

Compare todo_or_die vs SIT and see what are their differences.

todo_or_die

Write TODOs in code that ensure you actually do them (by searls)
Suggest topics
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

SIT

Serverless (offline-first, merge-friendly) Information Tracker (by sit-fyi)
Ticketing
Source Code
sit.fyi
Suggest alternative
Edit details
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
todo_or_die SIT
3 1
334 557
- 0.4%
4.6 0.0
6 months ago over 5 years ago
Ruby Rust
MIT License Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

todo_or_die

Posts with mentions or reviews of todo_or_die. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-12-12.

SIT

Posts with mentions or reviews of SIT. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-09-05.
  • todo-or-die – TODOs you cannot forget!
    6 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 5 Sep 2021
    I want the opposite - tickets-as-code part of the git repo. Something like SIT[1]. Fossil has it, but today's standard DVCS is git.

    There are 2 trends here:

    1. Everything-as-a-code stored in the git repo in a text format, close to the actual source code. If you store documention-as-a-code, diagrams-as-a-code, IaaC, tests-as-a-code, loadtesting-as-a-code, etc. - then why not issues/tickets as code also?

    2. Reduce number of tools/service you use in order to eliminate impedance mismatch and simplify workflows, and remove barriers to collaboration. For example if you standardize on Github, then you can use Guthub Issues, Projects, Packages, Actions, Codespaces, etc. And most developers are already having Github a/c.

    [1] https://github.com/sit-fyi/sit

What are some alternatives?

When comparing todo_or_die and SIT you can also consider the following projects:

carnet - A Tool for Sandboxing Cargo and Buildscripts

Erxes - Source available experience management infrastructure. Pioneering the future of experiences with XOS (Experience Operating System). Hubspot + Qualtrics alternative

tax - CLI Task List Manager

OTRS - ((OTRS)) Community Edition is one of the most flexible web-based ticketing systems used for Customer Service, Help Desk, IT Service Management. Please note that ((OTRS)) Community Edition offers limited OTRS functionality.

code-it-later-rs - Filter crumbs you left in comments of code to remind where you were

MantisBT - Mantis Bug Tracker (MantisBT)

sane_patch - Making monkey patches sane again

Zammad - Zammad is a web based open source helpdesk/customer support system

bad_actor_poc

django-todo - A multi-user, multi-group todo/ticketing system for Django projects. Includes CSV import and integrated mail tracking.

smart_todo - Enhance TODO comment in your Ruby code

GLPI - GLPI is a Free Asset and IT Management Software package, Data center management, ITIL Service Desk, licenses tracking and software auditing.

todo_or_die vs carnet SIT vs Erxes todo_or_die vs tax SIT vs OTRS todo_or_die vs code-it-later-rs SIT vs MantisBT todo_or_die vs sane_patch SIT vs Zammad todo_or_die vs bad_actor_poc SIT vs django-todo todo_or_die vs smart_todo SIT vs GLPI