texify
StreamDiffusion
texify | StreamDiffusion | |
---|---|---|
3 | 4 | |
508 | 8,947 | |
- | - | |
6.3 | 9.6 | |
4 months ago | 16 days ago | |
Python | Python | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
texify
-
Ask HN: Volunteer opportunities in science for software engineers?
[0] : "The Hybrid Artisans: A Case Study in Smart Tools" (2014) : https://amitz.co/ewExternalFiles/ToCHI_FreeD.pdf /
[1] : "Portable, non-invasive, mind-reading AI turns thoughts into text" https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1010811
[2] : https://towardsdatascience.com/how-to-convert-any-text-into-...
[3] : https://github.com/VikParuchuri/texify (Removes the extra brain to hand step in process https://stackoverflow.com/questions/39391080/extracting-hand... and/or make Minority report hand interface obsolete)
[4] : https://wherobots.com/havasu-a-table-format-for-spatial-attr...
-----
[register] : https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/26/michael_stonebraker_f...
[core1] : magnetic core memory : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic-core_memory
- FLaNK Weekly 31 December 2023
- Show HN: Texify – OCR math images to LaTeX and Markdown
StreamDiffusion
- FLaNK Weekly 31 December 2023
-
StreamDiffusion: Over 100fps Stable Diffusion on a 4090
Everyone does warmup before you measure. But measuring isn't always done right because we actually measure the GPU time only but some people naively use CPU time which is problematic because the process is asynchrenous. They have a few timing scripts though and I'm away from my GPU. There are some interesting things but they look like they know how to time. But it can also get confusing because is it considering batches or not. Some works do batch some do single. Only problem is when it isn't communicated correctly or left ambiguous.
Their paper is ambiguous unfortunately. Abstract, intro, and conclusion suggests single image by motivating with sequential generation (specifically mentioning metaverse). Experiment section says
> We note that we evaluate the throughput mainly via the average inference time per image through processing 100 images.
That implies batch along with their name Stream Batch...
Looking at the code I'm a bit confused. I'm away from my GPU so can't run. Maybe someone can let me know? This block[0] measures correctly but is using a downloaded image? Then just opens the image in the preprocess? (multi looks identical) This block[1] is using CPU? But running CPU. (there's another like this)
So I'm quite a bit confused tbh.
[0] https://github.com/cumulo-autumn/StreamDiffusion/blob/03e2a7...
[1] https://github.com/cumulo-autumn/StreamDiffusion/blob/03e2a7...
- StreamDiffusion: A Pipeline-Level Solution for Real-Time Interactive Generation
What are some alternatives?
kamal - Deploy web apps anywhere.
generative-ai-python - The Gemini API Python SDK enables developers to use Google's state-of-the-art generative AI models to build AI-powered features and applications.
tbmk - A commands bookmark for terminal 🔖
OpenVoice - Instant voice cloning by MyShell.
qsv - CSVs sliced, diced & analyzed.
Stirling-PDF - #1 Locally hosted web application that allows you to perform various operations on PDF files
whisper-plus - WhisperPlus: Faster, Smarter, and More Capable 🚀