tarpaulin
nushell
Our great sponsors
tarpaulin | nushell | |
---|---|---|
12 | 212 | |
2,331 | 29,963 | |
- | 2.8% | |
9.0 | 9.9 | |
6 days ago | 2 days ago | |
Rust | Rust | |
Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
tarpaulin
- Rust project test coverage
-
What are some good rust tools/extentions?
I’ll add tarpaulin, a crate I use for code coverage analysis.
-
Kudos to cargo-llvm-cov - really useful coverage reporting
Any pros/cons compared to tarpaulin?
-
Code Coverage Tooling
What about tarpaulin : https://github.com/xd009642/tarpaulin
- Measuring the coverage of a Rust program in Github Actions
-
Dare to ask for more #rust2024
Note that the tool cargo-tarpaulin provides code coverage.
-
Is there a rust way for doing TDD?
There is https://github.com/xd009642/tarpaulin for code coverage, but I'm not sure how widely it's used.
-
Uncovered Intermediate Topics
I know giving a link is not a tutorial, but I use https://github.com/xd009642/tarpaulin for this.
-
What's everyone working on this week (45/2021)?
Writing software test for [Toql](https://crates.io/crates/toql) and shaking out smaller bugs here and there. [Tarpaulin](https://github.com/xd009642/tarpaulin) is such a fantastic tool!
-
GlueSQL v0.7 - INDEX & ORDER BY are newly added.
Code quality also has become quite better than the last year. Almost codes in the project are tested by either unit or integration tests. Code coverage using tarpaulin is above 90%.
nushell
-
NuShell - Ceci n'est pas une |
These are just three small examples of what this shell written in Rust allows. The features are many and many more, but I'll leave it up to you to discover and enjoy them; I'm currently playing around with it and it's giving me a lot of satisfaction and immediacy, now it has a fixed place among the tools I use when working! The project is Open Source, so if you want to contribute, I invite you, as always, to do so, I leave you the link to the repo here!
- Xonsh: Python-powered, cross-platform, Unix-gazing shell
-
Fish shell 3.7.0: last release branch before the full Rust rewrite
Any thoughts on fish as compared to nushell [0]? It's similar to PowerShell in its philosophy and is also written in Rust.
[0] https://github.com/nushell/nushell
-
jc: Converts the output of popular command-line tools to JSON
> In PowerShell, structured output is the default and it seems to work very well.
PowerShell goes a step beyond JSON, by supporting actual mutable objects. So instead of just passing through structured data, you effectively pass around opaque objects that allow you to go back to earlier pipeline stages, and invoke methods, if I understand correctly: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/microsof....
I'm rather fond of wrappers like jc and libxo, and experimental shells like https://www.nushell.sh/. These still focus on passing data, not objects with executable methods. On some level, I find this comfortable: Structured data still feels pretty Unix-like, if that makes sense? If I want actual objects, then it's probably time to fire up Python or Ruby.
Knowing when to switch from a shell script to a full-fledged programming language is important, even if your shell is basically awesome and has good programming features.
-
Ripgrep is faster than {grep, ag, Git grep, ucg, pt, sift}
Maybe if the "popular" shells, but http://www.nushell.sh/ is looking better and better
- "<ESC>[31M"? ANSI Terminal security in 2023 and finding 10 CVEs
-
jq 1.7 Released
Yeah agreed, especially now that PowerShell is available cross-platform.
Nushell[1] also seems like a promising alternative, but I haven’t had a chance to play with it yet.
[1]: https://www.nushell.sh/
-
The Case for Nushell
I also discovered an existing discussion[1] related to this topic which includes a link[2] to a "helper to call nushell nuon/json/yaml commands from bash/fish/zsh" and a comment[3] that the current nushell dev focus is "on getting the experience inside nushell right and [we] probably won't be able to dedicate design time to get the interface of native Nu commands with an outside POSIX shell right and stable.".
[0] https://gitlab.com/RancidBacon/notes_public/-/blob/main/note...
[1] "Expose some commands to external world #6554": https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/6554
[2] https://github.com/cruel-intentions/devshell-files/blob/mast...
[3] https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/6554#issuecomment-...
I appreciate what projects like Nushell and Murex are trying to address, but having a saner scripting language and passing structured data in pipelines is not worth the drawbacks for me.
For one, Bash scripting is not so bad if you set some sane defaults and use ShellCheck. Sure, it has its quirks, but all languages do. Even so, the same golden rule applies: use a "real" programming language if your problem exceeds a certain level of complexity. This is relative and will depend on your discomfort threshold, but using the right tool for the job is always a good practice. No matter how good the shell language is, I would hesitate to write and maintain a complex project in it.
And for general QoL improvements with interactive use, Zsh is a fine shell, while still being POSIX compatible.
[1]: https://github.com/nushell/nushell/blob/main/crates/nu-comma...
[2]: https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/5027
[3]: https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/9310
-
Simple PowerShell things allowing you to dig a bit deeper than usual
I found nushell (https://www.nushell.sh) to be an impressive replacement "bash" for Windows
In terms of philosophy, think "Powershell but actually intuitive" : Every data is structured but command names are what you expect them to be. I usually don't even need to look at the documentation.
I liked it so much that I also replaced my shell on Linux with it, so I have the same terminal experience across all OSes
What are some alternatives?
Clippy - A bunch of lints to catch common mistakes and improve your Rust code. Book: https://doc.rust-lang.org/clippy/
fish-shell - The user-friendly command line shell.
cargo-llvm-cov - Cargo subcommand to easily use LLVM source-based code coverage (-C instrument-coverage).
elvish - Powerful scripting language & Versatile interactive shell
proptest - Hypothesis-like property testing for Rust
starship - ☄🌌️ The minimal, blazing-fast, and infinitely customizable prompt for any shell!
trust - Travis CI and AppVeyor template to test your Rust crate on 5 architectures and publish binary releases of it for Linux, macOS and Windows
PowerShell - PowerShell for every system!
Racer - Rust Code Completion utility
alacritty - A cross-platform, OpenGL terminal emulator.
cargo-watch - Watches over your Cargo project's source.
xonsh - :shell: Python-powered, cross-platform, Unix-gazing shell.