svix-webhooks VS localtunnel

That's exactly why we built Svix[1]. Building webhooks services, even with amazing tools like FastAPI, Celery and Redis is still a big pain. So we just built a product to solve it.

Hatchet looks cool nonetheless. Queues are a pain for many other use-cases too.

1: https://www.svix.com

Obviously Deno have vested interest it (and so do I as the founder of Svix[1]), but my take is that webhooks are great, though there are alternatives that could be better or complementary depending on the situation.

At Svix we also support running JS instead of sending webhooks (using Deno!), and it is very useful, but there are many limitations with this approach, and in general oftentimes people just want the data passed to their systems and deal with it there. Not write a bit of JS to do something ad-hoc.

So in short, like always with software engineering: "it depends" and there are tradeoffs to each approach.

1: https://www.svix.com

Svix - Webhooks as a Service. Send up to 50,000 messages/month for free.

We opted for a more manual approach, we have a ctx!() macro[1] we use for wrapping errors we want to enrich thay we use like this[2]: ctx!(some_fallible_fund(foo))?

I wodner if anyone is doing anything better? The nice thing is that we have relevant fields in our error type, so we get a full backtrace out if it.

1: https://github.com/svix/svix-webhooks/blob/main/server/svix-...

2: https://github.com/svix/svix-webhooks/blob/main/server/svix-...

This is what we do at Svix: https://docs.svix.com/receiving/source-ips

I've seen other companies (e.g. Stripe) also offer it via JSON, but I personally think it's not that important to provide it in a machine readable format if you don't plan on changing it; which you shouldn't as it'll break integrations. You should only add new IPs that can only be allocated to new customers.

P.S, if you'd like to start sending webhooks, you should probably check out Svix: https://www.svix.com

If I understand you, you just want some queue system, like kafka.But if you want a whole app who handle all your webhooks usage you can see : https://github.com/svix/svix-webhooks/

Might want to look into Svix and HostedHooks

Repository on Github: https://github.com/svix/svix-webhooks

localtunnel/localtunnel - Written in node. Popular suggestion.

Thanks for the history. I maintain this list[0], and wasn't aware of OG localtunnel, likely because there's a somewhat newer and now more popular project with the same name[1]. You appear to be correct on timing. Here's the earliest commits on GitHub for each of the projects:

OG localtunnel (2010): https://github.com/progrium/localtunnel/tree/fb82920d9d3e538...

Other localtunnel (2012): https://github.com/localtunnel/localtunnel/tree/93d62b9dbb9f...

ngrok (2012): https://github.com/inconshreveable/ngrok/tree/8f4795ecac7f92...

I'll see that OG localtunnel gets added to the list for posterity.

[0]: https://github.com/anderspitman/awesome-tunneling

[1]: https://github.com/localtunnel/localtunnel

These is a very common problem. Luckily, it's been solved already. My go-to tool for this was ngrok or localtunnel. Both of these tools are great, but they didn't fit my needs perfectly.

localtunnel — Expose locally running servers over a tunnel to a public URL. Free hosted version, and open source.

Localtunnel used to be a nice tunnel. It has gone through some enshittification lately.

> tunnel consent page now requires the tunnel creator's public IP in order to access tunnel content

https://github.com/localtunnel/localtunnel/issues/598

There are free non kafkaesque competitors out there.

I recently went through having to tunnel my development environment to setup an oauth2 flow for a rails integration. I found that using https://github.com/localtunnel/localtunnel was a better fit.

I prefer localtunnel: https://github.com/localtunnel/localtunnel

There's also Local Tunnel (http://localtunnel.me)

Not sure if it works combined with ngrok: https://www.npmjs.com/package/localtunnel