cli VS oak

You'll need to install the Supabase CLI in different ways depending on your OS, check out this guide for details and come right back here.

Recently, I noticed that in our remote project, the database storage schema has a migration not present when one sets up the local stack for development. Upon inspection, the Supabase CLI uses an old version of the storage image. Currently, there is no way to change this (that I know of) until the CLI team updates the CLI to use this version.

@doganugurlu Looks like Deno team implemented a fix https://denostatus.com/cllm0jzq219036bjottk03k2ac Are you still experiencing the issue?

We used to cache the modules locally, I will need to check if we made any configuration change. Can you kindly open an issue for Supabase CLI - https://github.com/supabase/cli/issues

> Oh, I had no idea that the functions routes were "wild card"! I don't think that's mentioned anywhere in the documentation, btw.

Good point! will update the docs.

> Sorry, I actually mean "import-maps": https://github.com/supabase/cli/issues/1338

I'll take a look at this issue. We've improved import map resolution in the last couple of CLI releases. But it looks like there are more edge cases.

We’ve moved the Supabase CLI to a fortnightly stable-release cycle. Every 2 weeks, we will update the latest tag on npm, the supabase/tap for homebrew, and the supabase scoop bucket. You can find the binary downloads in our GitHub latest release.

I think we've been working on that recently here: https://github.com/supabase/cli/pull/907

Can you try it locally with the supabase CLI? https://github.com/supabase/cli

For more info see this issue on GitHub.

I opened a Github issue: https://github.com/supabase/cli/issues/939, but I figured I'd see if any of you hit this and, hopefully, got past it.

Are there plans to support connections to self hosted remotes (to deploy to self-hosted instances, for example) with the cli? https://github.com/supabase/cli/issues/753

Are you using Oak? If not you should check it out https://oakserver.github.io/oak/

oak

oak - web framework

Hey @cjonas, I'm a developer on Supabase Edge Functions team. We do have plans to improve the current database trigger behavior. Will share more updates on this in the coming months.

Can you explain what do you mean by template URLs? Do you mean route params like `/v1/functions/users/:id`? If so, you can use a framework like Oak[1] to handle them. Edge Functions will make the full path including querystring available to the router.

Source maps, is it broken during local dev or when you deploy the function? Also, by broken you mean in a stack trace the file / line numbers aren't accurate?

[1] https://github.com/oakserver/oak

Oak framework [Website]

If you don’t want to use a full stack framework, you can develop your frontend and backend separately. With Cloudflare, you can serve your frontend and static assets with Pages or Workers Sites. With Deno Deploy, you can serve static assets from the filesystem. As for the backend, you probably want to use an HTTP framework such as Sunder (if you target Cloudflare Workers), oak, Router, or Sift (if you target Deno Deploy).

Oak server - middleware framework for Deno's native HTTP server. 'destjs' use it under the hood.

The issue about resources vanishing does happen, e.g. this example, meaning things like CI outages / non-deterministic builds / etc are possible, especially under a decentralized package hosting model.

Here's an example that uses Oak, a web application framework for Deno, to create a basic web server: