cli VS objectbox-dart

You'll need to install the Supabase CLI in different ways depending on your OS, check out this guide for details and come right back here.

Recently, I noticed that in our remote project, the database storage schema has a migration not present when one sets up the local stack for development. Upon inspection, the Supabase CLI uses an old version of the storage image. Currently, there is no way to change this (that I know of) until the CLI team updates the CLI to use this version.

@doganugurlu Looks like Deno team implemented a fix https://denostatus.com/cllm0jzq219036bjottk03k2ac Are you still experiencing the issue?

We used to cache the modules locally, I will need to check if we made any configuration change. Can you kindly open an issue for Supabase CLI - https://github.com/supabase/cli/issues

> Oh, I had no idea that the functions routes were "wild card"! I don't think that's mentioned anywhere in the documentation, btw.

Good point! will update the docs.

> Sorry, I actually mean "import-maps": https://github.com/supabase/cli/issues/1338

I'll take a look at this issue. We've improved import map resolution in the last couple of CLI releases. But it looks like there are more edge cases.

We’ve moved the Supabase CLI to a fortnightly stable-release cycle. Every 2 weeks, we will update the latest tag on npm, the supabase/tap for homebrew, and the supabase scoop bucket. You can find the binary downloads in our GitHub latest release.

I think we've been working on that recently here: https://github.com/supabase/cli/pull/907

Can you try it locally with the supabase CLI? https://github.com/supabase/cli

For more info see this issue on GitHub.

I opened a Github issue: https://github.com/supabase/cli/issues/939, but I figured I'd see if any of you hit this and, hopefully, got past it.

Are there plans to support connections to self hosted remotes (to deploy to self-hosted instances, for example) with the cli? https://github.com/supabase/cli/issues/753

There is an open issue about it. Looks like there's still some work to do

Perhaps ObjectBox would be a good alternative?

objectbox

2, 3, 4, 5, 6 objectbox my be your only bet. https://pub.dev/packages/objectbox

If you specifically mean a cloud database with sync built in, that's a bit trickier. Right now realm is in beta and includes sync support but is missing some other features, and last I checked objectbox had a sync service in beta that you had to jump through some hoops over email to get into.