toast
just
toast | just | |
---|---|---|
10 | 167 | |
1,543 | 17,053 | |
- | - | |
7.6 | 9.1 | |
26 days ago | 8 days ago | |
Rust | Rust | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
toast
-
Taskfile: A Modern Alternative to Makefile
This looks a lot like Toast [1], except that Toast runs your tasks in a (more) reproducible containerized environment to help eliminate the "works on my machine" problem.
[1] https://github.com/stepchowfun/toast
- Non-Obvious Docker Uses
-
Ask HN: What developer tools would you like to see?
- A build system like Nix [1] but with a better user experience / more straightforward command-line tooling.
- A dependently typed programming language like Coq [2] (or Agda, Idris, Lean, etc.) that is sufficiently approachable to gain enough mindshare that companies start adopting it for mission-critical work.
- A version control system which scales to petabytes or more. Something that I could put large video files in without thinking twice about it. Something a large company could use for their monorepo—or even their data warehouse.
- A note-taking tool that allows me to organize notes in a graph with links between them (like a wiki), not as files and folders in a tree, which enforces the invariant that every note is transitively reachable from some "root" so I never lose a note.
- Something like Toast [3] but which is also designed for running services in production, not just local development and continuous integration. A unified way to run code in dev, test, and prod environments. A new k8s.
[1] https://nixos.org/
[2] https://coq.inria.fr/
[3] https://github.com/stepchowfun/toast (shameless plug)
-
One machine can go pretty far if you build things properly
I realize you are probably very busy, so feel free to say no...but could you glance at this Github listing and tell me if it is what I'm looking for...it seems correct, but I may be misunderstanding...
https://github.com/stepchowfun/toast
Thanks so much in advance...
- Toast: Containerize your development and CI environments
-
GitHub Actions by Example
If you're looking for an alternative way to reproduce your CI locally that isn't tied to a particular CI system (but which has a nice integration with GitHub Actions), there's also Toast: https://github.com/stepchowfun/toast
- Toast: A high-level containerized build system
-
Dockerizing a Programming Language
OP is using Docker + Make in a similar way to how I was a few years ago, before I started using Toast (https://github.com/stepchowfun/toast). Toast lets you define tasks like you would with Make (without all the hairy gotchas of Makefiles), but it runs them inside Docker containers for better portability/reproducibility.
-
Whats your favourite open source Rust project that needs more recognition?
toast: containerized workflow
just
-
I stopped worrying and loved Makefiles
I don't like makefiles, but I've been enjoying justfiles: https://github.com/casey/just
- Just a Command Runner
-
Ask HN: Any tool for managing large and variable command lines?
I started using just [0] on my projects and have been very happy so far. It is very similar to make but focused on commands rather than build outputs.
Define your recipes and then you can compose them as needed.
[0] https://github.com/casey/just
-
Ask HN: What software sparks joy when using?
just - https://github.com/casey/just
-
GitHub switched to Docker Compose v2, action needed
Welp there is absolute chaos in that thread -- guess it's not an April Fools joke.
I wonder if relying on CI for anything other than provisioning machines is a mistake -- maybe we should have never moved from doing things from local scripts written in $LANGUAGE.
That said, I'm probably biased since I'm a massive fan of things like `make` and more appropriately for the current age, `just`[0]
[0]: https://github.com/casey/just
-
Which command did you run 1731 days ago?
> When a command has some cognitive requirements I create a script with some ${1:-default} values and I store them all in $PATH enabled local/bin
I would consider using just for this:
https://github.com/casey/just
-
Using Make – writing less Makefile
Your coworker's experience is more principled: Make is a mediocre tool for executing commands. It wasn't ever designed for that. Although it is pretty common to see what you are mentioning in projects because it doesn't require installing a dependency.
For a repo where an easy to install (single binary) dependency is a non-issue, consider using just. [1] You get `just -l` where you can see all the command available, the ability to use different languages, and overall simpler command writing.
[1] https://github.com/casey/just
-
Show HN: Just.sh – compiler that turns Justfiles into portable shell scripts
This is fantastic, but I'd say that this solution is somewhat in response to this open issue from 2019:
https://github.com/casey/just/issues/429
I really wish just was included as a package in distributions.
-
Sharing Saturday #496
So far, I didn't work on new features at all but on stabilizing the ground for further development: 1. CMake lists and modules were rewritten a lot, now managing builds and their configurations is much lesser pain. 2. Brought in Justfile for regular tasks, and it's great, no less. 3. Linters, formatters, analyzers for almost all the code (except for Janet for now, as because of it being a niche and young technology, it didn't get enough attention yet). 4. ECS stub. Now runtime class doesn't look like a god object. 5. Started writing unit tests which didn't happen with my personal projects before and maybe indicates how serious am I about this one :D 6. Some of previously hardcoded data has been moved to INI files. Now, if I release the game in 10 years, and in 10 more years some eccentric person decides to make a variant of it, it will be slightly simpler.
-
What’s with DevOps engineers using `make` of all things?
i've grown to like this for my personal projects. https://github.com/casey/just
What are some alternatives?
setup-msys2 - GitHub Action to setup MSYS2
Task - A task runner / simpler Make alternative written in Go
modus - A language for building Docker/OCI container images
cargo-make - Rust task runner and build tool.
Plume - Federated blogging application, thanks to ActivityPub (now on https://git.joinplu.me/ — this is just a mirror)
cargo-xtask
Iron - An Extensible, Concurrent Web Framework for Rust
Taskfile - Repository for the Taskfile template.
gutenberg - A fast static site generator in a single binary with everything built-in. https://www.getzola.org
CodeLLDB - A native debugger extension for VSCode based on LLDB
pest - The Elegant Parser
cargo-release - Cargo subcommand `release`: everything about releasing a rust crate.