stc
AECforWebAssembly
stc | AECforWebAssembly | |
---|---|---|
18 | 51 | |
5,710 | 31 | |
0.2% | - | |
8.4 | 8.0 | |
3 months ago | 7 days ago | |
Rust | C++ | |
Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
stc
- STC (Rust-based TypeScript type checker) is officially abandoned
-
TypeScript Is Surprisingly OK for Compilers
Wonder no more: https://github.com/dudykr/stc
Written in Rust by the (lead?) dev of SWC
SWC (speedy web compiler) compiles TS to JS
-
Show HN: Ezno, a TypeScript checker written in Rust, is now open source
The analogy (by swc's author) would be https://github.com/dudykr/stc
-
How do people use Zod on a large project?
I'm also hoping for STC https://stc.dudy.dev/ but I don't think it will be released any time soon.
-
What are some stuff that Rust isn't good at?
MyPy and tsc on the other hand? Please make a Ruff for MyPy and hurry up and fund the author of SWC to develop STC. I'm tired of waiting several seconds after each :w for my quickcheck window to update.
-
TypeScript 5.0
>If we could push JavaScript performance to be another order of magnitude faster
And it would speed up the TypeScript Compiler.
My bet is:
TypeScript typechecker in Rust:
https://github.com/dudykr/stc
-
No one cares about Bun's speed. Your CI does though
typescript(tsc) is the only one that does type checking.
bun, deno, esbuild, swc etc. can parse the syntax, but they chuck the TS (they probably don't even add it to the AST, but I haven't checked).
Keeping up with syntax is very doable. It doesn't change often, and updating the parser when it does isn't much work.
There are some past/ongoing projects[1][2] to create type checkers faster than tsc, but they aren't going to reach full parity and probably don't plan on keeping up with language features.
[1] https://github.com/dudykr/stc
- Open sourcing Ezno – JavaScript compiler and TypeScript checker written in Rust
-
What would you rewrite in Rust?
Well the checker is in progress.
- TypeScript type checker written in Rust
AECforWebAssembly
-
Gren 0.3: Source maps
Great! I have not yet made source maps for my programming language that compiles to WebAssembly, and I probably never will.
- Mislite li da okolina ima potpuno pogrešno mišljenje o ljudima koji rade u IT-u?
- Koja je najapsurdnija poruka o pogrešci koju je neki vaš program ispisivao?
-
What is the most absurd error message your compiler/interpreter was once outputting?
Up until today, my AEC-to-WebAssembly was, if somebody tried to use two structures of different types as the second and the third operand to the ?: (ternary conditional) operator, as in this example: ``` Structure First Consists Of Nothing; EndStructure
- Poteškoće s pronalaskom posla
-
Good languages for writing compilers in?
Well, I have written the first compiler for my programming language, targetting x86, in IE6-compatible JavaScript, and the second compiler, targetting WebAssembly, has been written in C++11. I think that, to choose a language to write a compiler in, you need to look at at least two things:
-
Why does GCC run in Docker produce around 30% smaller statically linked C++ executables than GCC run on Linux? AECforWebAssembly is 1.08 MB large if compiled using GCC 13.1 in Docker, but it is 1.59 MB if compiled using GCC 13.1 on Debian.
You can see the releases v2.5.3 and v2.5.2 of AECforWebAssembly on GitHub. They are produced with the same version of GCC, the only difference (as far as I know) is that v2.5.2 was produced directly on Debian, whereas v2.5.3 was cross-compiled from Windows to Linux using Docker.
-
Let's Make Sure Github Doesn't Become the only Option
That could be true. I host my AEC-to-WebAssembly compiler on GitHub, GitLab and SourceForge, and it's only on GitHub that it has 21 stars and 2 forks. On GitLab and SourceForge, it has zero of both.
- koliko vam je bilo tesko nac posao u programiranju?
-
Does the JVM / CLR even make sense nowadays?
Well, the main compiler for my programming language is targetting the JavaScript Virtual Machine by outputting WebAssembly. I think it's even better than targetting Java Virtual Machine, because, for one thing, your executables can run in any modern browser if you output WebAssembly. If you target Java Virtual Machine, the users need to actually download your app. Furthermore, there is an official assembler for WebAssembly called WebAssembly Binary Toolkit (WABT), so your compiler can output assembly and not have to deal with binary files. There is nothing equivalent to that for Java Virtual Machine.
What are some alternatives?
mlib - Library of generic and type safe containers in pure C language (C99 or C11) for a wide collection of container (comparable to the C++ STL).
Lark - Lark is a parsing toolkit for Python, built with a focus on ergonomics, performance and modularity.
Containers - This library provides various containers. Each container has utility functions to manipulate the data it holds. This is an abstraction as to not have to manually manage and reallocate memory.
wasm-fizzbuzz - WebAssembly from Scratch: From FizzBuzz to DooM.
ctl - The C Template Library
mal - mal - Make a Lisp
this-week-in-rust - Data for this-week-in-rust.org
Drogon-torch-serve - Serve pytorch / torch models using Drogon
swc - Rust-based platform for the Web
libCat - 🐈⬛ A runtime for C++26 w/out libC or POSIX. Smaller binaries, only arena allocators, SIMD, stronger type safety than STL, and value-based errors!
NuDB - NuDB: A fast key/value insert-only database for SSD drives in C++11
gdal-js - This is an Emscripten port of GDAL, an open source X/MIT licensed translator library for raster and vector geospatial data formats.