AECforWebAssembly Alternatives

AECforWebAssembly reviews and mentions

• Gren 0.3: Source maps
  1 project | /r/ProgrammingLanguages | 19 Jun 2023

  Great! I have not yet made source maps for my programming language that compiles to WebAssembly, and I probably never will.

• Mislite li da okolina ima potpuno pogrešno mišljenje o ljudima koji rade u IT-u?
  2 projects | /r/CroIT | 18 Jun 2023
• Koja je najapsurdnija poruka o pogrešci koju je neki vaš program ispisivao?
  1 project | /r/CroIT | 11 Jun 2023
• What is the most absurd error message your compiler/interpreter was once outputting?
  1 project | /r/ProgrammingLanguages | 10 Jun 2023

  Up until today, my AEC-to-WebAssembly was, if somebody tried to use two structures of different types as the second and the third operand to the ?: (ternary conditional) operator, as in this example: ``` Structure First Consists Of Nothing; EndStructure

• Poteškoće s pronalaskom posla
  2 projects | /r/CroIT | 3 Jun 2023
• Good languages for writing compilers in?
  8 projects | /r/ProgrammingLanguages | 11 May 2023

  Well, I have written the first compiler for my programming language, targetting x86, in IE6-compatible JavaScript, and the second compiler, targetting WebAssembly, has been written in C++11. I think that, to choose a language to write a compiler in, you need to look at at least two things:

• Why does GCC run in Docker produce around 30% smaller statically linked C++ executables than GCC run on Linux? AECforWebAssembly is 1.08 MB large if compiled using GCC 13.1 in Docker, but it is 1.59 MB if compiled using GCC 13.1 on Debian.
  1 project | /r/learnprogramming | 6 May 2023

  You can see the releases v2.5.3 and v2.5.2 of AECforWebAssembly on GitHub. They are produced with the same version of GCC, the only difference (as far as I know) is that v2.5.2 was produced directly on Debian, whereas v2.5.3 was cross-compiled from Windows to Linux using Docker.

• Let's Make Sure Github Doesn't Become the only Option
  9 projects | /r/programming | 2 May 2023

  That could be true. I host my AEC-to-WebAssembly compiler on GitHub, GitLab and SourceForge, and it's only on GitHub that it has 21 stars and 2 forks. On GitLab and SourceForge, it has zero of both.

• koliko vam je bilo tesko nac posao u programiranju?
  3 projects | /r/CroIT | 30 Apr 2023
• Does the JVM / CLR even make sense nowadays?
  2 projects | /r/ProgrammingLanguages | 26 Apr 2023

  Well, the main compiler for my programming language is targetting the JavaScript Virtual Machine by outputting WebAssembly. I think it's even better than targetting Java Virtual Machine, because, for one thing, your executables can run in any modern browser if you output WebAssembly. If you target Java Virtual Machine, the users need to actually download your app. Furthermore, there is an official assembler for WebAssembly called WebAssembly Binary Toolkit (WABT), so your compiler can output assembly and not have to deal with binary files. There is nothing equivalent to that for Java Virtual Machine.

• A note from our sponsor - InfluxDB
  www.influxdata.com | 24 May 2025

  InfluxDB 3 OSS is now GA. Transform, enrich, and act on time series data directly in the database. Automate critical tasks and eliminate the need to move data externally. Download now. Learn more →