iceraven-browser
standards-positions | iceraven-browser | |
---|---|---|
180 | 280 | |
598 | 4,315 | |
1.0% | 3.1% | |
7.6 | 0.0 | |
3 months ago | 6 days ago | |
Python | Kotlin | |
Mozilla Public License 2.0 | Mozilla Public License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
standards-positions
-
Firefox Webserial Addon
You can read through the conversations to understand more of the context
https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/100#is...
https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/95#iss...
https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/336
The main struggle is around giving informed consent that explains the risks. Understandably, browsers don't want to ship a "Set my printer on fire" button.
-
iOS404
You can check why Mozilla and Apple have opted to not support this.
https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/154
https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/28
Neither Mozilla or Webkit are satisfied that the proposal is safe by default, and contains footguns for the user that can be pretty destructive.
-
Show HN: DualShock calibration in the browser using WebHID
FWIW Mozilla updated their position on Web Serial API to "neutral" and clarified that they might be okay with enabling the API with an add-on.
https://mozilla.github.io/standards-positions/#webserial
Allowing serial but not HID would be really strange. With HID you get standard identifiers that let you filter out devices that are too dangerous for the web. With serial you get nothing. Even if you know a device is dangerous, there's no way to protect users from it.
-
Tailwind CSS v4.0.0 Alpha
Hasn't FireFox been dragging their asses on @scope? https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/472
It took years to just convince them of the need for it. And I'm not sure anyone got convinced vs Chrome had already shipped it and Safari has it planned so they caved in.
Hard to believe FireFox used to be a leader of the modern web.
-
An HTML Switch Control
As mentioned by others, OK idea, but not a fan that this isn't standardized. After a quick search+peruse, these seem to indicate that it's not around the corner either. Happy (/hope) to be corrected.
https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/4180
https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/990
-
Platform issues which disadvantage Firefox compared to first-party browsers
Mozilla's position on these specs is nicely outlined publicly and transparently as part of their standards-positions project: https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/100
I'm kinda glad it's not implemented in my browser, to be honest, because the whole thing seems like a security nightmare.
It's a shame it impacts some hobby usecases, but I don't think this outweighs the reasoning set out on the GitHub issue.
-
What Progressive Web App (PWA) Can Do Today
This should have big warnings on it. Some of these are not web standards; they are features implemented unilaterally by Google in Blink that have been explicitly rejected by both Mozilla and Apple on privacy and security grounds.
Take Web Bluetooth, for example:
Mozilla:
> This model is unsustainable and presents a significant risk to users and their devices.
— https://mozilla.github.io/standards-positions/#web-bluetooth
Apple:
> Here are some examples of features we have decided to not yet implement due to fingerprinting, security, and other concerns, and where we do not yet see a path to resolving those concerns
— https://webkit.org/tracking-prevention/
This is Microsoft’s Embrace, Extend, and Extinguish bullshit applied to the web platform by Google. Google keeps implementing these things despite all other major rendering engines rejecting them, convinces people that they are part of the web, resulting in sites like this, then people start asking why Firefox and Safari are “missing functionality”. These are not part of the web platform, they are Google APIs that have been explicitly rejected.
-
Why Are Tech Reporters Sleeping on the Biggest App Store Story?
Is BLE a PWA requirement? I think they explained their position pretty well here, regardless of whether I agree:
https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/95#iss...
-
Reason to Use Firefox Is Sync That Works
I took a glance at Can I Use what the difference between the last public release of Firefox and Chrome is [1] and they don't really have that big of a difference in the eyes of normal use-cases? Some of these aren't implemented purely because of privacy reasons, the proposals aren't finished yet or complexity [2].
Why would Firefox need to change to Chromium engine? The only websites I notice that don't work with Firefox is because of user-agent targetting or just putting 5-second time-outs in Youtube code on non-chrome webbrowsers [3].
Can you give some examples of websites not working on Firefox?
[1] https://caniuse.com/?compare=chrome+120%2Cfirefox+121&compar...
[2] https://mozilla.github.io/standards-positions/
[3] https://www.neowin.net/news/youtube-seemingly-intentionally-...
- Mozilla's Position on CSS Scope
iceraven-browser
-
What browser do you use?
Iceraven for Android. Vivaldi for Windows.
-
Why Bother With uBlock Being Blocked In Chrome? Now Is The Best Time To Switch To Firefox
For Android, I use Iceraven, a Firefox fork built with Firefox stable's code that adds more options, features, customizations, and extensions than Firefox for Android has. So I won't have to switch from that even when the Chromium based browsers potentially all adopt Mv3 fully and drop Mv2, because I've already got a browser on that platform which hopefully will be immune that I'm already using not because of what may happen in the future, but because it's my favorite browser.
-
Brave appears to install VPN Services without user consent
This list of Firefox forks was posted not so long ago - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37735443
- librewolf (Desktop) [1]
- Mull (Android) [2]
- Iceraven (Android) [3]
- Mercury (Desktop) [4]
- Pulse Browser (Desktop) [5]
- Waterfox (Desktop) [6]
- Floorp (Desktop) [7] --> This submission
- Pale Moon (Desktop) [8]
- Mullvad Browser (Desktop) [9]
- Tor browser (Desktop - Android) [10]
This list is not inclusive. It probably contains the famous forks.
[1] https://librewolf.net
[2] https://gitlab.com/divested-mobile/mull-fenix
[3] https://github.com/fork-maintainers/iceraven-browser
[4] https://github.com/Alex313031/Mercury
[5] https://pulsebrowser.app
[6] https://www.waterfox.net
[7] https://floorp.app/en
[8] https://www.palemoon.org
[9] https://mullvad.net/en/browser
[10] https://www.torproject.org/download/
-
Background video playing
Iceraven has an extension available called "Video Background Play Fix" that does what you describe.
-
LibreWolf – custom version of Firefox, focused on privacy, security and freedom
It should be noted that Iceraven is not compiled from source, ie. it only compiles the UI/app layer, and not the engine or other components.
https://github.com/fork-maintainers/iceraven-browser/issues/...
Full disclosure: I maintain Mull and Fennec F-Droid.
-
Firefox desktop extensions coming soon for the upcoming Android release
it's already possible via this Firefox fork https://github.com/fork-maintainers/iceraven-browser/release...
-
MF DOOM's wife speaks out publicly for the first time regarding his sudden death
Kiwi Browser and Ungoogled Chromium for Android support chrome extensions on mobile. Firefox supports some extensions. Firefox Nightly (warning, unstable) supports even more. Firefox forks like Iceraven, Fennec, and Mull also support extensions. All of these guys support uBlock Origin.
-
Best web browser for phone
Thanks, is this it? Just want to make sure I'm getting the correct one and not forked. https://github.com/fork-maintainers/iceraven-browser
-
How to pirate reddit?
Maybe I should also mention Kiwi Browser (Chromium-based) and Iceraven (Firefox-based) specifically for mobile.
-
Mobile Browsers
Iceraven for Android has a large library of extensions that are really easy to add:
What are some alternatives?
webcontainer-core - Dev environments. In your web app.
Mull - [DEPRECATED See Mull-Fenix] Build scripts for a web browser built upon Mozilla technology
WHATWG HTML Standard - HTML Standard
Fenix - ⚠️ Fenix (Firefox for Android) moved to a new repository. It is now developed and maintained as part of: https://github.com/mozilla-mobile/firefox-android
wpt - Test suites for Web platform specs — including WHATWG, W3C, and others
Mull-Fenix - Build scripts for a web browser built upon Mozilla technology
firefox-ios - Firefox for iOS
bromite - Bromite is a Chromium fork with ad blocking and privacy enhancements; take back your browser!
WebKit - Home of the WebKit project, the browser engine used by Safari, Mail, App Store and many other applications on macOS, iOS and Linux.
bypass-paywalls-firefox-clean
Fakeflix - Not the usual clone that you can find on the web.
mull-fenix