standard
Ruby's bikeshed-proof linter and formatter 🚲 (by standardrb)
nanocolors
Use picocolors instead. It is 3 times smaller and 50% faster. (by ai)
| standard | nanocolors | |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | 17 | |
| 2,592 | 934 | |
| 0.5% | - | |
| 8.0 | 9.3 | |
| 9 days ago | over 2 years ago | |
| Ruby | JavaScript | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
standard
Posts with mentions or reviews of standard.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-02-02.
-
Am I the only one who doesn't put parentheses around the parameters in Ruby method definitions?
Rubocop has a default rule that says to put parentheses when there are parameters; even Standardrb has a default ([https://github.com/standardrb/standard/blob/8307fa8f449f896075ccad 74bf6a128ed2c26189/config/base.yml#L1098:title])
- Standardrb: Ruby's bikeshed-proof linter and formatter
-
Must-have gems for mature Rails
gem "rubocop" - https://github.com/rubocop/rubocop | Set up code guidelines for your dev team, I recommend using whatever Standard recommends.
-
A Writer's Ruby
Cynically, reading heavily between the lines, this reads to me like DHH just found out lots of rubyists like standardrb. https://github.com/standardrb/standard -- and this is his quick reaction to it.
-
"Useless Ruby sugar": Endless (one-line) methods
This is a huge reason why I still use StandardJS and—shifting back to Ruby—why I rejected the countless requests for implementing line-length or any other metrics analysis rules for [StandardRB](https://github.com/standardrb/standard). There is always a legitimate edge case when it comes to length of lines and functions and the alternative—chopping them off arbitrarily—is rarely an improvement.
-
An Introduction to RuboCop for Ruby on Rails
This approach is known as Standard Ruby. It can also be completed with plugins, including one for Ruby on Rails projects.
-
It's Official: the Standard Ruby VS Code extension
Oh, this is fantastic! Would you be willing to send a quick PR to our README?
-
Rails vs Rubocop?
[0] https://github.com/testdouble/standard
-
Linting and Auto-formatting Ruby Code With RuboCop
If you don't want to fiddle with configuration files and the wealth of options provided by RuboCop, consider taking a look at the Standard project. It's largely a pre-configured version of RuboCop that aims to enforce a consistent style in your Ruby project without allowing the customization of any of its rules. The lightning talk where it was first announced gives more details about its origin and motivations.
- Utilizando o padrão interactor no Ruby on Rails
nanocolors
Posts with mentions or reviews of nanocolors.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-09-26.
-
A notable JavaScript developer shamelessly copied one of my most downloaded nod
I reached out to him when I could've filed a takedown notice. Later, I asked to shake hands on it[1][2][3], but he was already sunk-cost-mode on and determined to die on a stupid hill. Only because I called him out is that we were able to had my git history restored and copyright attributed.
[1]: https://github.com/ai/nanocolors/pull/14#issuecomment-927757...
[2]: https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/56996/135221889-52...
[3]: https://twitter.com/jorgebucaran/status/1442055448899641348
- Nano Colors: 2x times faster than chalk and use 5x less space in node_modules
What are some alternatives?
When comparing standard and nanocolors you can also consider the following projects:
Ruby style guide - A community-driven Ruby coding style guide
colorette - 🌈Easily set your terminal text color & styles
eslint-config-standard - ESLint Config for JavaScript Standard Style
stdlib - ✨ Standard library for JavaScript and Node.js. ✨
rubocop-rspec - Code style checking for RSpec files
Standard - 🌟 JavaScript Style Guide, with linter & automatic code fixer
ansi-strikethrough - The color strikethrough, in ansi.
oh-my-fish - The Fish Shell Framework
rubocop-rails - A RuboCop extension focused on enforcing Rails best practices and coding conventions.
Babel (Formerly 6to5) - 🐠 Babel is a compiler for writing next generation JavaScript.
Hanami::Model - Ruby persistence framework with entities and repositories
standard vs Ruby style guide
nanocolors vs colorette
standard vs eslint-config-standard
nanocolors vs stdlib
standard vs rubocop-rspec
nanocolors vs Standard
standard vs ansi-strikethrough
nanocolors vs oh-my-fish
standard vs rubocop-rails
nanocolors vs Babel (Formerly 6to5)
standard vs Hanami::Model
nanocolors vs eslint-config-standard